首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Examining traditional irrigation methods,irrigation scheduling and alternate furrows irrigation on vertisols in northern Ethiopia
Institution:1. School of Civil & Water Resources Engineering, Bahir Dar University, P.O. Box 430, Ethiopia;2. Laboratory of Hydrology and Water Management, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Gent, Belgium;3. College of Agriculture & Environmental Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Ethiopia;4. Department of Geography, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281 (S8), B-9000 Gent, Belgium;5. Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia;6. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium
Abstract:In northern Ethiopia, where traditional (farmers) irrigation management on Vertisols is widely practiced, sustainable food security has always been a challenge. The reasons for this are multi-dimensional, but of utmost importance is, low-tech irrigation water management. The main objective of the present study is, therefore, to examine technologies of irrigation water management that might enable farmers to increase water productivity (WP) on vertisols.A comparative study has been undertaken between the traditional irrigation management (every furrow-traditional scheduling) and alternative water management options on maize plots in northern Ethiopia. The options include alternate furrows-scientific scheduling and every furrow-scientific scheduling. A field experiment was undertaken over two irrigation seasons (1998/1999 and 1999/2000). Results were compared on the basis of yield, WP and economic productivity concepts.Yield-based comparison has shown that every furrow-scientific scheduling generates the highest yield levels followed by alternate furrows-scientific scheduling. The yield increase (by every furrow-scientific scheduling) over the traditional management was found to be 54%.WP-based comparison has shown that alternate furrows-scientific scheduling generates the highest WP values followed by every furrow-scientific scheduling. The increase (by alternate furrow irrigation, scientific scheduling) over the traditional irrigation management was 58%.Economic productivity-based comparison has shown that the highest economic return was obtained from every furrow-scientific scheduling followed by alternate furrows-scientific scheduling. The increase in income (by every furrow-scientific scheduling) over the traditional irrigation management was 54%.The overall observation is that depending on the availability of water and labour resources, one can decide to use either of the alternate management options to obtain economically reasonable yield. In northern Ethiopia, where water is limiting (and not labour), every furrow-scientific scheduling can be an option.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号