首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

耕作措施对双季稻田土壤碳及有机碳储量的影响
引用本文:何莹莹,张海林,孙国锋,汤文光,李永,陈阜. 耕作措施对双季稻田土壤碳及有机碳储量的影响[J]. 农业环境保护, 2010, 0(1): 200-204
作者姓名:何莹莹  张海林  孙国锋  汤文光  李永  陈阜
作者单位:[1]中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院,农业部农作制度重点开放实验室,北京100094 [2]湖南省土壤肥料研究所,长沙410125 [3]湖南省宁乡县农业局,长沙410600
基金项目:国家十一五支撑计划(2006BAD15B01);2008年公益性行业(农业)科研专项(200803028)
摘    要:针对不同耕作措施对双季稻田的固碳效应和固碳潜力问题,选择湖南省宁乡县的双季稻区试验点进行了有机碳、活性有机碳以及耕层有机碳储量的研究,以期为制定适合于稻田条件下的合理耕作方式提供理论依据。结果表明,耕作措施和秸秆还田对有机碳(SOC)和活性有机碳(AOC)含量均产生不同程度的影响。免耕处理下,有机碳和活性有机碳含量皆随土壤深度的增加而减少,土壤0~5cm的SOC和AOC的含量最高,且与其他层次达到显著性差异水平(P<0.05),具有明显的表层富集现象。与免耕相比,旋耕和翻耕则更利于5~10cm和10~20cm土层的有机碳和活性有机碳的积累。比较秸秆还田对SOC和AOC的影响表明,秸秆还田有效地提高了0~10cm有机碳含量,但对10~20cm并未产生显著影响,秸秆的输入并未增加土壤活性有机碳的含量。采用等质量方法计算了耕层土壤有机碳储量,结果显示旋耕秸秆还田使有机碳储量明显增加,而免耕只增加了土壤0~5cm和5~10cm土层有机碳储量,10~20cm有机碳储量有所降低,但耕作措施对有机碳储量的长效作用还有待于进一步研究。

关 键 词:耕作措施  稻田  有机碳  活性有机碳  有机碳储量

Effect of Different Tillage on Soil Organic Carbon and the Organic Carbon Storage in Two-crop Paddy Field
HE Ying-ying,ZHANG Hai-lin,SUN Guo-feng,TANG Wen-guang,LI Yong,CHEN Fu. Effect of Different Tillage on Soil Organic Carbon and the Organic Carbon Storage in Two-crop Paddy Field[J]. Agro-Environmental Protection, 2010, 0(1): 200-204
Authors:HE Ying-ying  ZHANG Hai-lin  SUN Guo-feng  TANG Wen-guang  LI Yong  CHEN Fu
Affiliation:1.College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University; Key Laboratory of Fanning System, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100193, China; 2.Hunan Soil and Fertilizer Institute, Changsha 410125, China; 3.Ningxiang Agricultural Bureau , Hunan Province, Changsha 410600, China)
Abstract:Soil organic carbon sequestration influence agroecosystem suitability and affects global wanning, more and more is concerned by people now. Tillage not only affects soil organic carbon contents but also influence the components of SOC. In order to solve the problem of carbon sequestration that occurred in the double rice paddy field, four tillage practices were conducted from 2005 in Ningxiang County, the double rice paddy Hunan Province. Tillage practices included conventional tillage, rotary tillage and no tillage. Rice stubble was returned in conventional tillage (CTS), rotary tillage (RTS) and no tillage (NTS), 12 500 kg. bm-2. Conventional tillage also includes plow tillage without stubble returned(CT). The tillage methods were the same of early rice and late flee. The total organic carbon (TOC), active organic carbon (AOC) and soil organic carbon storage were discussed in this paper with data of 2007. The results indicated that TOC and AOC were decreased with the depth of soil layer. The stratification ratios(SR) of TOC and AOC were increased significantly under no-tillage than that under minimum tillage and moldboard plow tillage at the 5% level. The storage of SOC and TOC at the 5-20 cm soil layer was enhanced un- der CTS and RTS compared to NTS. Straw returned could inerease SOC storage in the 0-10 cm layer effectively, but no signifieant effect was found in the 10-20 cm soil layer. Furthermore, stubble returned had not significant effect on AOC under moldboard plow tillage. Rotary tillage had a great improvement on the storage of SOC, while, No-tillage increased SOC storage in the layer of 0-10 cm and reduced in the 10-20 cm layer by using the method of equivalent soil mass.
Keywords:tillage  paddy field  soil organic carbon  active organic carbon  organic carbon storage
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号