Putting back what we take out,but how much?: Phosphorus and nitrogen additions to farmed Leucadendron ‘Safari Sunset’ and Leucospermum ‘Succession’ (Proteaceae)

Proteaceae are adapted to low-nutrient soils in the various regions where they occur. However, harvesting of flowering stems for the cut-flower industry must eventually cause soil nutrient depletion sufficient to reduce yields. Different N forms, and N and P concentrations were supplied to two Proteaceae cultivars (Leucadendron ‘Safari Sunset’ and Leucospermum ‘Succession’) in a controlled fertigation experiment, and appropriate concentrations for maximum growth with minimum nutrient accumulation or loss were determined. Small additions of N (0.025–0.1 mM) significantly improved growth of both cultivars growing on Strandveld sandy soil. Larger additions of N (up to 2 mM N) resulted in poor growth (both cultivars) and N accumulation in the soil (Safari Sunset). Small additions of P (<10 μM) significantly improved growth of both cultivars and resulted in no accumulation or loss of P in the soil. Larger additions of P (up to 500 μM) resulted in poor growth, P toxicity symptoms and P leaching from the upper soil layers. Best N forms in descending order of both plant visual appearance and vegetative yield were: urea ≥ ammonium nitrate > ammonium sulphate > calcium nitrate. Phosphorus toxicity symptoms were associated with increased concentrations of leaf P, Ca and Fe. Under conditions of maximum growth (10 μM P and 0.1 mM N) Safari Sunset removed 18 ± 0.6 g N, 1.5 ± 0.1 g P, 5.3 ± 0.6 g K and Succession removed 5.5 ± 0.2 g N, 0.3 ± 0.02 g P, 3.1 ± 0.5 g K over 6 months. At maximum growth, plants acquired more N and P amounts than were supplied, but supplying higher N and P concentrations adversely affected growth. Thus, a more complex or slow-release form of N and P than urea and soluble phosphate, respectively, may provide enough N and P to replace losses from the farm soil at the low concentrations required for proteas.