首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Evaluation of comparative advantages in the profitability and competitiveness of the small-scale dairy system of Tulancingo Valley,Mexico
Authors:Rodolfo Rogelio Posadas-Domínguez  Oscar Enrique Del Razo-Rodríguez  Isaac Almaraz-Buendía  Armando Pelaez-Acero  Verónica Espinosa-Muñoz  Samuel Rebollar-Rebollar  Jesús Armando Salinas-Martínez
Institution:1.Escuela Superior de Zimapán-Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo (UAEH) [Zimapán Graduate School-Autonomous University of the State of Hidalgo],Zimapán de Zavala,Mexico;2.Instituto de Ciencias Agropecuarias-UAEH [Institute of Agricultural Sciences],Tulancingo,Mexico;3.Centro Universitario UAEM Temascaltepec-Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México [Temascaltepec University Center-Autonomous University of the State of Mexico],Temascaltepec,Mexico
Abstract:This article combines a Policy Analysis Matrix with a sensitivity and poverty line analysis with the objective of evaluating the economic contribution of comparative advantages to the private profitability and competitiveness of small-scale dairy systems. For 1 year, socioeconomic data were collected from 82 farms selected from four strata via statistical sampling. Two scenarios were established to determine the quantitative contribution of comparative advantages: (1) a simulated scenario, which accounted for the cost of purchasing the total food and the opportunity cost of the family labour force (FLF), and (2) an actual production scenario, which accounted for the cost of producing food and eliminating the payment of the FLF and included other income. The E3 and E4 producers were the most profitable and competitive in the simulated scenario and actual production scenario. Of the four scales evaluated, the E2 and E1 producers were the most efficient in taking advantage of the economic contribution provided by the comparative advantages in their own production of food and employment of the FLF, in addition to accounting for other income, a condition that increased their profitability by 171 and 144% and competitiveness by 346 and 273%, respectively. The poverty results indicated that only E3 and E4 producers were non-vulnerable in the simulated scenario and actual production scenario. The purchase of food was the comparative advantage with the greatest sensitivity to cost increases in the two scenarios analysed, which exacerbated the effect on the E1 and E2 producers.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号