首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


An entirely new approach based on remote sensing data to calculate the nitrogen nutrition index of winter wheat
Authors:ZHAO Yu  WANG Jian-wen  CHEN Li-ping  FU Yuan-yuan  ZHU Hong-chun  FENG Hai-kuan  XU Xin-gang  LI Zhen-hai
Affiliation:1 Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, P.R.China2 National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, P.R.China3 College of Geomatics, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, P.R.China
Abstract:The nitrogen nutrition index (NNI) is a reliable indicator for diagnosing crop nitrogen (N) status. However, there is currently no specific vegetation index for the NNI inversion across multiple growth periods. To overcome the limitations of the traditional direct NNI inversion method (NNIT1) of the vegetation index and traditional indirect NNI inversion method (NNIT2) by inverting intermediate variables including the aboveground dry biomass (AGB) and plant N concentration (PNC), this study proposed a new NNI remote sensing index (NNIRS). A remote-sensing-based critical N dilution curve (Nc_RS) was set up directly from two vegetation indices and then used to calculate NNIRS. Field data including AGB, PNC, and canopy hyperspectral data were collected over four growing seasons (2012–2013 (Exp.1), 2013–2014 (Exp. 2), 2014–2015 (Exp. 3), 2015–2016 (Exp. 4)) in Beijing, China. All experimental datasets were cross-validated to each of the NNI models (NNIT1, NNIT2 and NNIRS). The results showed that: (1) the NNIRS models were represented by the standardized leaf area index determining index (sLAIDI) and the red-edge chlorophyll index (CIred edge) in the form of NNIRS=CIred edge/(a×sLAIDIb), where “a” equals 2.06, 2.10, 2.08 and 2.02 and “b” equals 0.66, 0.73, 0.67 and 0.62 when the modeling set data came from Exp.1/2/4, Exp.1/2/3, Exp.1/3/4, and Exp.2/3/4, respectively; (2) the NNIRS models achieved better performance than the other two NNI revised methods, and the ranges of R2 and RMSE were 0.50–0.82 and 0.12–0.14, respectively; (3) when the remaining data were used for verification, the NNIRS models also showed good stability, with RMSE values of 0.09, 0.18, 0.13 and 0.10, respectively. Therefore, it is concluded that the NNIRS method is promising for the remote assessment of crop N status.
Keywords:nitrogen nutrition index (NNI)  critical nitrogen dilution curve  standardized leaf area index determining index (sLAIDI)
本文献已被 CNKI ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《农业科学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《农业科学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号