| 森林游憩价值评价之CVM、TCM比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 阮君 孙秋碧. 森林游憩价值评价之CVM、TCM比较[J]. 湖北林业科技, 2005, 0(5): 30-35 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 阮君 孙秋碧 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 福建大学管理学院统计系,福州,350002;福建大学管理学院统计系,福州,350002 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 综述了森林游憩价值评价中有代表性的条件价值法(CVM)和旅行费用法(TCM)的原理、评价过程。通过对比,分析二者的异同点,同时提出整合应用建议。
|
| 关 键 词： | 森林游憩价值 CVM TCM |
| 收稿时间： | 2005-07-11 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005-07-11 |
Comparison Between Methods of CVM and TCM for Evaluation on Forest Recreational Value |
| |
| Ruan Jun,Sun Qiubi. Comparison Between Methods of CVM and TCM for Evaluation on Forest Recreational Value[J]. Hubei Forestry Science and Technology, 2005, 0(5): 30-35 |
| |
| Authors: | Ruan Jun Sun Qiubi |
| |
| Affiliation: | Statistics Department of Management College in Fujian University Fuzhou 350002 |
| |
| Abstract: | This article representatively reviews the principle and evaluation process of contingentvaluation method (CVM) and the travel cost method (TCM) that is often used in evaluation on forest recreation value. By comparison, the similarity and dissimilarity between the two methods are analyzed;meanwhile, the suggestion of integration application is presented. |
| |
| Keywords: | forest recreational value CVM TCM |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《湖北林业科技》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《湖北林业科技》下载全文 |
