| 刑法第20条第3款定性问题思考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 安军.刑法第20条第3款定性问题思考[J].信阳农业高等专科学校学报,2004,14(4):16-17,21. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 安军 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 武汉大学,湖北,武汉,430072 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本文从法条间的逻辑关系、立法目的、类似的立法例和罪刑法定原则四个方面对刑法第20条第3款加以分析,认为此款应定性为正当防卫。它是对刑法第20条前两款规定的补充、说明和解释。
|
| 关 键 词： | 正当防卫 必要限度 罪刑法定 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-4916(2004)04-0016-02 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年8月15日 |
Define paragraph 3 of article 20 of criminal law |
| |
| AN,Jun.Define paragraph 3 of article 20 of criminal law[J].Journal of Xinyang Agricultural College,2004,14(4):16-17,21. |
| |
| Authors: | AN Jun |
| |
| Abstract: | This article tries to analyze paragraph 3 of article 20 of Criminal Law from four respects of the logical relation among articles; the legislative goals; the analogous legislation examples and the principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime. So the author thinks this paragraph should be defined as the right of justifiable defense playing a supplement, illustration and further explanation roles. |
| |
| Keywords: | justifiable defense limits of necessity a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
