首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Evaluation of brucellosis RB51 vaccine for domestic water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) in Trinidad
Authors:Fosgate G T  Adesiyun A A  Hird D W  Johnson W O  Hietala S K  Schurig G G  Ryan J  Diptee M D
Institution:

a Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA

b Faculty of Medical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of the West Indies, Champs Fleurs, Trinidad and Tobago

c Department of Statistics, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA

d California Animal Health and Food Safety Laboratory, Davis, CA 95616, USA

e Virginia Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA

f Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Ministry of Agriculture, Lands and Marine Resources, Champs Fleurs, Trinidad and Tobago

g Field Services County Victoria, Ministry of Agriculture, Lands and Marine Resources, San Fernando, Trinidad and Tobago

Abstract:Thirty-two young domestic water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) were obtained from a brucellosis-free farm to determine effectiveness of RB51 vaccination for prevention of Brucella infection under natural-exposure conditions in Trinidad. Study animals (20 males and 12 females 5–20 months old) were assigned to vaccination or control groups, using a block randomization design ensuring equal sex distributions between groups. The vaccination group received commercially available RB51 at the recommended calfhood dose of (1.0–3.4)×1010 colony-forming units (CFU) and controls received 2 ml sterile saline. Vaccination did not result in positive serologic results as measured by four traditional agglutination tests: standard tube agglutination test (STAT), standard plate agglutination test (SPAT), buffered plate agglutination test (BPAT), and card agglutination. Study animals were maintained in a brucellosis-positive herd in southern Trinidad with an estimated 56% prevalence to allow for natural exposure to B. abortus, which was evaluated using STAT, SPAT, BPAT, and card tests. Animals were sampled seven times over 2 years and were classified as positive if they had persistent agglutination titers or had Brucella isolated from specimens collected at completion of the study. Five of the original 32 study animals were lost to follow-up during the field trial. Six of the 14 (43%) vaccinated animals completing the study were classified as positive for Brucella infection—as were two of the 13 (15%) control animals (P=0.21). Isolates from four vaccinates and one control were confirmed as B. abortus biovar 1.
Keywords:Brucella abortus  RB51  Vaccination  Domestic water buffalo  Brucellosis  Trinidad
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号