Depolarization of motor nerve terminals by pyrethroids in susceptible and kdr-resistant house flies |
| |
Authors: | Vincent L. Salgado Stephen N. Irving Thomas A. Miller |
| |
Affiliation: | Division of Toxicology and Physiology, Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, California 92521 USA |
| |
Abstract: | When applied at concentrations of one nM or higher to a house fly larval neuromuscular preparation, deltamethrin (DM) and fenvalerate (FV) greatly increased miniature excitatory postsynaptic potential (mepsp) rate and blocked neuromuscular transmission. The DM-induced mepsp discharge was abolished by tetrodotoxin (TTX), removal of Ca2+ from the saline, or by application of hyperpolarizing stimuli to the nerve, indicating that it was due to depolarization of the presynaptic terminals. Also, in the presence of TTX, K+ depolarization increased mepsp rate at the same external K+ concentration before and after DM treatment, confirming that DM released transmitter by depolarizing the nerve terminals rather than by altering the voltage dependence of transmitter release. The potassium channel blocker tetraethylammonium (TEA) increased mepsp rate somewhat, while aconitine (20 μM), which keeps sodium channels open, increased mepsp rate consistently. Pretreatment of nerves with a subthreshold dose of TEA greatly increased the mepsp rate-increasing activity of DM and aconitine, while a subthreshold level of aconitine did not synergize DM. These observations suggest that DM, like aconitine, depolarized nerves by modifying the sodium channels. Knockdown resistant (kdr) larvae were resistant to the depolarizing action of DM and aconitine but not to that of TEA, indicating that the kdr gene produced a modified sodium channel which was less sensitive to the action of pyrethroids and aconitine. During sustained transmitter release by DM, evoked release gradually declined, resulting in a condition called early block in which spontaneous release was high and release could be evoked by electrotonic depolarization of the nerve terminals, but not by a nerve action potential. Early block was probably due to conduction block in the nerve terminals. Early block eventually gave way to late block, characterized by the decline of spontaneous release to subnormal levels and complete failure of evoked release. After late block, the calcium ionophore X-537A could not release transmitter, suggesting that late block was due to depletion of available transmitter. DM did not have a direct effect upon extrasynaptic muscle membrane. However, after late block, muscles were left insensitive to the putative transmitters glutamate and aspartate when these were bath or iontophoretically applied. A low rate of mepsps persisted after late block, indicating that the muscles were still sensitive to the natural transmitters. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|