|
|||||
|
|
| 猪旋毛虫病4种检测方法的比较 | |
| 引用本文： | 邓瑞广,张改平,赵东,张和平,王海利. 猪旋毛虫病4种检测方法的比较[J]. 中国兽医寄生虫病, 2006, 14(1): 5-7 |
| 作者姓名： | 邓瑞广 张改平 赵东 张和平 王海利 |
| 作者单位： | 1. 河南省农业科学院生物技术研究所,郑州,450002 2. 平顶山市畜牧局,平顶山,467000 3. 南阳市城区动物检疫站,南阳,473000 |
| 摘 要： | 目的 试验比较快速试纸条法、快速ELISA法、常规镜检法和人工胃液消化法检测猪旋毛虫病效果。方法 采用上述4种方法分别对1566头屠宰猪作旋毛虫病的检测。结果 旋毛虫检出率分别为1．66％、1．66％、1．21％和1．60％。结论 快速试纸条法具有特异、敏感、快速、简便的特点，用于现场检测可收到立等可取的效果。 |
| 关 键 词： | 旋毛虫病 检测方法 对比试验 试纸条法 |
| 文章编号： | 1005-0868（2006）01-0005-03 |
| 收稿时间： | 2005-04-28 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005-04-28 |
COMPARISON TEST OF DETECTING SWINE TRICHINELLOSIS WITH FOUR METHODS |
|
| DENG Rui-guang,ZHANG Gai-ping,ZHAO Dong,ZHANG He-ping,WANG Hai-li. COMPARISON TEST OF DETECTING SWINE TRICHINELLOSIS WITH FOUR METHODS[J]. Chinese Journal of Veterinary Parasitology, 2006, 14(1): 5-7 | |
| Authors: | DENG Rui-guang ZHANG Gai-ping ZHAO Dong ZHANG He-ping WANG Hai-li |
| Affiliation: | 1. lustitute of Biotechnology, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou 450002, China; 2. Animal Husbandry Bureau of Ping Dingshan, Ping Dingshan 467000, China; 3. Station of Animal Quarantine in Nanyang City, Nanyang 473000, China |
| Abstract: | Objective The intention of test is to compare the effect of detecting trichinellosis with rapid detection strip, ELISA, general microscope and artificially pepsin. Methods 1 566 swines were detected respectively with the above four methods. Results The positive rate is 1.66%, 1.66%, 1.21% and 1.60% severally with the above four methods. Conclusion The strip possesses excellent characteristics for rapid diagnosis, including high specificity and sensitivity, simplicity, especially the strip is easy to perform and can be done in 3 -5 minutes at the spot. |
| Keywords: | ELISA |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |