Comparing biofloc,clear-water,and hybrid nursery systems (Part I): Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) production,water quality,and stable isotope dynamics |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit, Laboratorio de Bioingeniería Costera. Escuela Nacional de Ingeniería Pesquera, Nayarit C.P. 63000, Mexico;2. Posgrado Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, Posta Zootécnica, Jesus María, Aguscalientes, Mexico;3. Posgrado Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Boca del Río, Km. 12 Carretera Veracruz-Córdoba, Veracruz C.P. 94290, Mexico;4. Instituto Politécnico Nacional, CIIDIR Unidad Sinaloa, Boulevard Juan de Dios Bátiz Paredes # 250, Guasave, Sinaloa C.P. 81101, Mexico;5. Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, A.C., Mazatlán, Sinaloa 82000, Mexico;6. Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Unidad Académica Mazatlán, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mazatlán, Sinaloa 82040, Mexico |
| |
Abstract: | Indoor, intensive, nursery-based recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) can provide high-quality juvenile shrimp for indoor or pond-based production systems in a biosecure manner. However, it is unclear what type of RAS is most appropriate for indoor shrimp nurseries. This study compared three types of RAS nurseries: biofloc (BF), clear-water (CW), and hybrid (HY). Each treatment included four, randomly assigned 160 L (0.35-m2) tanks that were stocked with 3000 post-larvae shrimp m−3. The post-larvae (PL10) shrimp had an initial average weight of 7 ± 0.0 mg and were grown for 48 days. The BF tanks included external settling chambers as the only filtration mechanism. The CW tanks had settling chambers, foam fractionators, and external biofilters to fully clarify the water and process nitrogenous waste. Hybrid tanks included settling chambers, and external biofilters to maintain some suspended solids along with external biofiltration. Overall, the CW treatment had significantly higher dissolved oxygen (DO) and pH levels than the BF and HY systems. The HY treatment had significantly higher DO than the BF treatment. Nitrite concentration was significantly higher in the HY treatment than the CW treatment. Turbidity in the BF treatment was significantly higher than the other treatments. On the final sample date, the BF treatment had significantly higher nitrite and nitrate concentrations than the other treatments. Differences between treatments in terms of shrimp survival, mean harvest weight, specific growth rate, and feed conversion ratio were not significant. The final weight of the shrimp at 48 days for the BF, CW, and HY were 670 mg, 640 mg, and 590 mg respectively. A stable isotope mixing model indicated that, in the BF treatment, 13% of the C and 34% of the N in harvested shrimp tissue may have originated from biofloc material, signifying some nutrient recycling. The nitrification process was more effective with the inclusion of an external biofilter. All three system types appear suitable for RAS shrimp nursery production although consideration should be given to water quality consistency and filtration costs. |
| |
Keywords: | Pacific white shrimp Indoor RAS Biofloc Clear-water Hybrid-water |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|