Altmetrics高分论文与ESI热门论文的比较分析——以临床医学领域为例

以临床医学的学术论文为样本,对数据进行定量化分析和可视化展现,从年载文量、期刊分布、作者地域分布、研究热点多角度透视Altmetrics高分论文与ESI顶尖论文的特点,从而分析Altmetrics与引文分析法之间的差异。研究发现相比传统的引文分析法, Altmetrics具有及时性、来源期刊多元化、公平性和主题贴近生活等特点,也有严谨性不足的弱点,所以唯有将Altmetrics与引文分析法结合,共同构筑学术评价体系,才能准确预测科研成果的学术影响力。

Comparison between High Attention Papers and ESI Hot Papers: A Case Study of Clinical Medicine

In this research, based on the academic papers of clinical medicine, we use quantitative analysis and visualization to analyze the differences between Altmetrics and citation analysis by exploring the features between top Altmetric Score papers and ESI hot papers from multiple aspects, such as the annual volume, the distribution of journals, the regional distribution of authors and research hot spots. Compared with the traditional citation method, Altmetrics has the advantages of timeliness, diversification of source journals and themes close to life but lack of rigidity and poor stability. Only by combining Altmetrics with citation analysis, the academic influence of scientific achievements can be accurately predicted by the academic evaluation system.