No significant difference in N2O emission,fertilizer-induced N2O emission factor and CH4 absorption between anaerobically digested cattle slurry and chemical fertilizer applied timothy (Phleum pratense L.) sward in central Hokkaido,Japan

Abstract

Nitrous oxide (N₂O) and methane (CH₄) fluxes from a fertilized timothy (Phleum pratense L.) sward on the northern island of Japan were measured over 2?years using a randomized block design in the field. The objectives of the present study were to obtain annual N₂O and CH₄ emission rates and to elucidate the effect of the applied material (control no nitrogen], anaerobically digested cattle slurry ADCS] or chemical fertilizer CF]) and the application season (autumn or spring) on the annual N₂O emission, fertilizer-induced N₂O emission factor (EF) and the annual CH₄ absorption. Ammonium sulfate was applied to the CF plots at the same application rate of NH₄-N to the ADCS plots. A three-way ANOVA was used to examine the significance of the factors (the applied material, the application season and the year). The ANOVA for the annual N₂O emission rates showed a significant effect with regard to the applied material (P?=?0.042). The annual N₂O emission rate from the control plots (0.398?kg N₂O-N ha^?1?year^?1) was significantly lower than that from the ADCS plots (0.708?kg N₂O-N ha^?1?year^?1) and the CF plots (0.636?kg N₂O-N ha^?1?year^?1). There was no significant difference in the annual N₂O emission rate between the ADCS and CF plots. The ANOVA for the EFs showed insignificance of all factors (P?>?0.05). The total mean?±?standard error of the EFs (fertilizer-induced N₂O-N emission/total applied N) was 0.0024?±?0.0007 (kg N₂O-N kg N]^?1), which is similar to the reported EF (0.0032?±?0.0013) for well-drained uplands in Japan. The CH₄ absorption rates differed significantly between years (P?=?0.014). The CH₄ absorption rate in the first year (3.28?kg CH₄?ha^?1?year^?1) was higher than that in the second year (2.31?kg CH₄?ha^?1?year^?1), probably as a result of lower precipitation in the first year. In conclusion, under the same application rate of NH₄-N, differences in the applied materials (ADCS or CF) and the application season (autumn or spring) led to no significant differences in N₂O emission, fertilizer-induced N₂O EF and CH₄ absorption.