Conservation planning for connectivity across marine, freshwater, and terrestrial realms |
| |
Authors: | Maria Beger Hedley S. Grantham Kerrie A. Wilson Peter J. Mumby Daniel R. Brumbaugh |
| |
Affiliation: | a The School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Commonwealth Centre for Applied Environmental Decision Analysis, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia b Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville QLD 4811, Australia c School of Engineering and Science, Victoria University, PO Box 14428, Melbourne VIC 3001, Australia d The Nature Conservancy, Global Marine Initiative, University of California Santa Cruz, Center for Ocean Health Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA e Marine Spatial Ecology Lab., School of Biosciences, Hatherly Laboratory, Prince of Wales Road, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon EX4 4PS, UK f The Nature Conservancy, Brasilia, SRTVS Qd. 701 - Conj. D - Bl. B Ed. Brasília Design Center - Lj. 246 Brasilia - DF, 70.340-907, Brazil g Center for Biodiversity and Conservation, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Conservation plans are usually developed for regions that encompass only one environmental realm (terrestrial, freshwater or marine) because of logistical, institutional and political constraints. This is inadequate because these realms often interact through processes that form, utilize and maintain interfaces or connections, which are essential for the persistence of some species and ecosystem functions. We present a conceptual framework for systematic conservation prioritization that explicitly accounts for the connectivity between the terrestrial, marine, and freshwater realms. We propose a classification of this connectivity that encompasses: (1) narrow interfaces, such as riparian strips; (2) broad interfaces, such as estuaries; (3) constrained connections, such as corridors of native vegetation used by amphibians to move between natal ponds and adult habitat; and (4) diffuse connections, such as the movements of animals between breeding and feeding habitats. We use this taxonomy of inter-realm connectivity to describe existing and new spatial conservation prioritization techniques that aim to promote the persistence of processes that operate between realms. |
| |
Keywords: | Systematic conservation planning Realm connectivity Environmental realms Integrated conservation Conservation decision-support systems |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|