首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

江河源区退化天然草地的恢复及其生态效益分析
引用本文:王启基,史惠兰,景增春,王长庭,王发刚. 江河源区退化天然草地的恢复及其生态效益分析[J]. 草业科学, 2004, 21(12): 37-41
作者姓名:王启基  史惠兰  景增春  王长庭  王发刚
作者单位:中国科学院西北高原生物研究所,青海,西宁,810001;青海畜牧兽医职业学院,青海,湟源,810600
基金项目:国家科技攻关项目,中国科学院资源与生态环境研究项目
摘    要:根据天然草地退化程度的差异,采用松耙 补播 施肥 封育(退化较严重的草地)、封育 施肥(轻度退化草地)等措施,植物群落物种组成、多样性等特征值及其植被盖度发生明显变化.研究第2年结果表明,物种数封育 施肥处理最高(32种),对照居中(26种),补播 施肥处理最低(13种);多样性指数大小依次为封育 施肥(3.126)、对照(2.819)、补播 施肥(1.494);均匀度指数大小依次为封育 施肥(0.902)、对照(0.865)、补播 施肥(0.582);群落总盖度大小依次为封育 施肥(85.9%)、补播 施肥(79.7%)、对照(72.9%);补播 施肥 封育处理后地上生物量最大(460.65 g/m2),原生植被 封育 施肥处理居中(310.14 g/m2),对照最低(178.96 g/m2);地下生物量大小依次为封育 施肥(6 920.37 g/m2)、补播 施肥(1 458.96 g/m2)、对照(828.91 g/m2);补播 施肥 封育处理优良牧草较对照提高近50倍,杂草类减少82.81%,封育 施肥处理较对照良牧草比例提高48倍,杂草类比例减少80.46%.半人工草地通过灭除杂草和施肥相结合的示范试验表明:单纯进行灭杂,地上生物量减少,灭杂和施肥相结合不仅可提高地上生物量,而且可提高优良牧草的比例;不同处理区土壤养分含量各不相同,其中封育 施肥处理全氮、全碳、有机碳最高,对照居中,补播 施肥较低.

关 键 词:江河源区  退化天然草地  恢复  生态效益分析
文章编号:1001-0629(2004)12-0037-05

Recovery and benefit analysis of ecology on degraded natural grassland of the source region of yangze and yellow rivers
WANG Qi-ji,SHI Hui-lan,JING Zeng-chun,WANG Chang-ting,WANG Fa-gang. Recovery and benefit analysis of ecology on degraded natural grassland of the source region of yangze and yellow rivers[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2004, 21(12): 37-41
Authors:WANG Qi-ji  SHI Hui-lan  JING Zeng-chun  WANG Chang-ting  WANG Fa-gang
Affiliation:WANG Qi-ji~1,SHI Hui-lan~1,JING Zeng-chun~1,WANG Chang-ting~1,WANG Fa-gang~2
Abstract:According to degradation degree of natural grassland,relevant treatments were used such as scarification +reseeding +enclosure (for heavily degraded grassland), enclosure +fertilize (for lightly degraded grassland). These treatments make plant community structure and plant cover change significantly. The results after two yeas recovery showed that the species number represented by enclosure +fertilize treatment (32 species) > Control (26 species) > reseeding +fertilize treatment (13 species). The species diversity index had the same trend with the species number. The evenness index represented by enclosure +fertilize treatment (0.902) > CK (0.865) > reseeding +fertilize treatment (0.582). The vegetation total cover decreased from enclosure +fertilize treatment (85.9%) to reseeding +fertilize treatment (79.7%) to Control (72.9%). The aboveground biomass decreased from reseeding +fertilize treatment (460.65 g/m~2) to natural grassland+enclosure +fertilize treatment (310.14g/m~2) to Control (178.96g/m~2). The underground biomass decreased from enclosure+fertilize treatment (6 920.37g/m~2) to reseeding +fertilize (1458.96g/m~2) treatment to Control (828.91g/m~2). The high-quality grasses in reseeding +fertilize treatment and enclosure +fertilize treatment were 50 and 48 times higher than that in Control. Forbs in reseeding +fertilize treatment and enclosure +fertilize treatment decreased by 82.21% and 80.46% compared to that in Control. Semi-artificial grassland established by killing forbs and fertilize, The results showed that the combination of killing forbs with fertilize treatment may increase not only above-biomass but also proportion of high quality herbage. But production can not be increased at only killing forbs treatment. The soil nurture change was enclosure +fertilize treatment > Control > reseeding +fertilize treatment
Keywords:the source region of Yangze and Yellow rivers  degraded natural grassland  recovery  Benefit analysis of ecology
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号