首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

冲沟不同部位土壤机械组成及抗冲性差异
引用本文:张 素,熊东红,校 亮,吴 汉,杨 丹,张宝军,郑 旭.冲沟不同部位土壤机械组成及抗冲性差异[J].土壤,2016,48(6):1270-1276.
作者姓名:张 素  熊东红  校 亮  吴 汉  杨 丹  张宝军  郑 旭
作者单位:1. 中国科学院山地灾害与地表过程重点实验室,成都 610041; 中国科学院/水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所,成都 610041; 中国科学院大学,北京 100049;2. 中国科学院山地灾害与地表过程重点实验室,成都 610041; 中国科学院/水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所,成都 610041;3. 四川省宁南县水务局,四川宁南,615400
基金项目:国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划);国家自然科学基金项目(面上项目,重点项目,重大项目);中国科学院重点资助项目
摘    要:选取3类典型冲沟(活跃、较活跃和稳定)的集水区、沟头和沟床土壤,探明冲沟不同空间部位土壤机械组成特性及其抗冲性差异,结果表明:1活跃、较活跃冲沟土壤质地均为砂质壤土,稳定冲沟各部位土壤质地各不相同;黏粒含量、粉粒含量总体为活跃冲沟较活跃冲沟稳定冲沟;细砂粒含量为较活跃冲沟活跃冲沟稳定冲沟;粗砂粒含量则是活跃冲沟较活跃冲沟稳定冲沟。23类冲沟各部位土壤抗冲性均是沟床最高,而3类冲沟同一部位抗冲性大小比较中,沟头和沟床土壤抗冲性为稳定冲沟较活跃冲沟活跃冲沟,集水区以活跃冲沟土壤抗冲性最小,较活跃与稳定冲沟的土壤抗冲性相当。3线性回归分析表明:砂粒含量是影响3类冲沟各部位土壤抗冲性的主要指标,黏粒含量影响稳定冲沟各部位土壤抗冲性,粉粒含量与较活跃冲沟沟头、稳定冲沟集水区和沟床的土壤抗冲性有关。研究结果从土壤机械组成和土壤抗侵蚀性的关系角度为冲沟研究提供一定的理论参考。

关 键 词:冲沟  土壤抗冲性  土壤机械组成  干热河谷  不同部位
收稿时间:2015/12/2 0:00:00
修稿时间:2016/1/25 0:00:00

The Difference of Soil Mechanical Composition and Soil Anti-scourability on Different Positions of Gullies
ZHANG Su,XIONG Donghong,XIAO Liang,WU Han,YANG Dan,ZHANG Baojun and ZHENG Xu.The Difference of Soil Mechanical Composition and Soil Anti-scourability on Different Positions of Gullies[J].Soils,2016,48(6):1270-1276.
Authors:ZHANG Su  XIONG Donghong  XIAO Liang  WU Han  YANG Dan  ZHANG Baojun and ZHENG Xu
Institution:institution of mountain harzads and environment,CAS,institution of mountain harzads and environment,CAS
Abstract:The gully area with tattered landform and loosen soil structure has threated to degraded ecosystem restoration in dry-hot valley. For ascertaining the difference characteristics of soil mechanical composition and soil anti-scourability(ANS), the soil on three different gully positions (the gully watershed, gully heard and gully bed) of different activities gullies (the active gully, semi-active gully and stable gully) had been selected. The research results indicated that the soil texture on active gully and semi-active gully were sandy loam, but that were various on different position of stable gully. Soil clay content and silt content from maximum to minimum showed the order of between and among stable gully, semi-active gully and active gully. Coarse sand content was completely opposite of the former. Fine sand content from maximum to minimum showed the order of semi-active gully, active gully and stable gully. Comparing each position of three activities gullies, the soil ANS on gully beds were the highest. Comparing same position of three activities gullies, the soil ANS on gully heard and gully bed from highest to lowest showed the order of stable gully, semi-active gully and active gully. The soil ANS on active gully watershed was the lowest and the soil ANS on semi-active gully watershed was similar to stable gully watershed. The linear regression analysis indicated that the sand content was the main indicator affecting the soil ANS on three different gully positions of different activities gullies. The clay content was the main indicator affecting the soil ANS on three gully positions of stable gully. The silt content associated with the soil ANS to the semi-active gully head also between the stable gully watershed and gully bed. The research results can be expected to provide theoretical references for the further study on the relationship between soil texture and soil anti-erosion.
Keywords:Gully  Soil anti-scourability  Soil mechanical composition  Dry-hot valley  Different positions
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《土壤》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《土壤》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号