首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Interspace/Undercanopy Foraging Patterns of Beef Cattle in Sagebrush Habitats
Affiliation:1. Provincial Rangeland Ecologist, Sustainable Resource Development, Lands Division, Calgary, Alberta, Canada;2. Rangeland Scientists, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center (EOARC), 67826-A, Hwy 205, Burns, OR 97720, USA;1. Graduate Research Assistant, Animal Sciences Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA;2. Associate Professor, Animal Sciences Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA;3. Professor, School of Natural Resource Sciences, Animal Sciences Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA;4. Associate Professor, Animal Sciences Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA.;1. Lecturer, Department of Natural Resources, Egerton University, Egerton, Kenya;2. Professor, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA;1. W. A. Franke College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA;2. The Nature Conservancy, Montana Field Office, Helena, MT 59601, USA;3. Department of Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences, Wildlife Biology Program and Avian Science Center, W. A. Franke College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA
Abstract:Forage selection patterns of cattle in sagebrush (Artemisia L.) communities are influenced by a variety of environmental and plant-associated factors. The relative preference of cattle for interspace versus under-sagebrush canopy bunchgrasses has not been documented. Potential preferences may indirectly affect habitat for sage-grouse and other ground-nesting birds. Our objectives were to investigate grazing patterns of cattle with respect to undercanopy (shrub) and interspace tussocks, determine the influence of cattle grazing on screening cover, and relate shrub morphology to undercanopy grazing occurrence. Eighteen-day replicated trials were conducted in the summers of 2003 and 2004. Findings suggest cattle initially concentrate grazing on tussocks between shrubs, and begin foraging on tussocks beneath shrubs as interspace plants are depleted. Grazing of undercanopy grass tussocks was negligible at light-to-moderate utilization levels (< 40% by weight). Grass tussocks under spreading, umbrella-shaped shrub canopies were less likely (P < 0.001) to be grazed than those beneath erect, narrow canopies. Horizontal screening cover decreased (P < 0.001) with pasture utilization. At the trial’s end, removal of 75% of the herbaceous standing crop induced about a 5% decrease in screening cover in all strata from ground level to 1 m with no differences among strata (P = 0.531). This implied that shrubs constituted the majority of screening vegetation. Our data suggest that conservative forage use, approaching 40% by weight, will affect a majority (about 70%) of interspace tussocks and a lesser proportion (about 15%) of potential nest-screening tussocks beneath sagebrush. Probability of grazing of tussocks beneath shrubs, however, is also affected by shrub morphology. These findings will help managers design grazing programs in locales where habitat for ground nesting birds is a concern.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号