首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Comparing different forest zoning options for landscape-scale management of the boreal forest: Possible benefits of the TRIAD
Authors:Pascal Cô    ,Rebecca Tittler,Christian Messier,Daniel D. Kneeshaw,Andrew Fall,Marie-José  e Fortin
Affiliation:1. Centre d’étude de la forêt, Université du Québec à Montréal, C.P. 8888, Succ. Centre-Ville Montréal, QC, H3C 3P8, Canada;2. School of Resource and Environmental Management, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada;3. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 3G5, Canada
Abstract:Forest management has been criticised in the last 20 years for its negative impact on the native species, structures and functions of the forest. Of many possible alternatives proposed to minimize these effects, the functional zoning (or TRIAD) approach is gaining popularity in North America. The goal of this approach is to minimize the negative environmental impacts of forestry while maintain timber supply by dividing the forest into three broad land-use zones: (1) conservation, (2) ecosystem management, and (3) wood production. In this study, we used a spatially explicit landscape model to simulate the effects of fire and six different forest management scenarios on a boreal mixedwood forest management unit in central Quebec. The management scenarios examined included the current practices scenario, a scenario proposed by the provincial government, and four TRIAD scenarios varying in the amount of forest allocated to each of the three zones. For each scenario, we examined the harvest volume, percentage old-growth forest or old forest managed to favour old-growth attributes, and effective mesh size of forest patches by 20-year age classes. With more area set aside for conservation and high-retention partial cut harvesting techniques designed to maintain the attributes of old-growth stands, all TRIAD scenarios resulted in higher percentages of stands with old-growth attributes than the current practices scenario and the government proposed scenario, and two of the four TRIAD scenarios also resulted in higher harvest volume over the long term. All forest management scenarios resulted in significantly lower effective mesh size than the fire-only scenario, but this difference was not as pronounced for the four TRIAD scenarios as for the current practice and government proposed scenarios. We conclude that the TRIAD approach has the potential to minimize some of the negative impacts of forestry on the landscape, while maintaining timber supply over the long term.
Keywords:Fragmentation   Sustainable forest management   Spatially explicit landscape event simulator (SELES)   TRIAD   Conservation areas   Forest zoning
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号