首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

上海烟草(集团)湄潭基地主栽烤烟品种差异性评价
引用本文:高维常,潘文杰,张长华,计玉,袁有波,瞿永生,邹焱.上海烟草(集团)湄潭基地主栽烤烟品种差异性评价[J].贵州农业科学,2009,37(7).
作者姓名:高维常  潘文杰  张长华  计玉  袁有波  瞿永生  邹焱
作者单位:1. 贵州省烟草科学研究所,贵州,贵阳,550003
2. 贵州省湄潭县烟草专卖局,贵州,湄潭,564100
3. 上海烟草(集团)公司,上海,杨浦,200082
基金项目:上海烟草(集团)公司资助项目"上海烟草(集团)重要烟叶产地烟草品种喜好性研究" 
摘    要:为了对上海烟草(集团)公司湄潭基地的烤烟品种提供决策依据,采用小区对比的方法,对基地种植的K326、NC82和云烟87进行了农艺性状、经济性状、外观品质和内在质量等评价.结果表明:K326的农艺性状综合表现最好,其次是云烟87.NC82表现最差.3个品种产量相当,但产值云烟87最高,为1468.06元/667m2;原烟外观质量云烟87最好,NC82内在质量最为协调.

关 键 词:烤烟  品种  差异性  评价  湄潭

Evaluation on Difference of Three Main Flue-cured Tobacco Varieties in Meitan Base of Shanghai Tobacco Group
GAO Wei-chang,PAN Wen-jie,ZHANG Chang-hua,JI Yu,YUAN You-bo,QU yong-sheng,ZOU Yan.Evaluation on Difference of Three Main Flue-cured Tobacco Varieties in Meitan Base of Shanghai Tobacco Group[J].Guizhou Agricultural Sciences,2009,37(7).
Authors:GAO Wei-chang  PAN Wen-jie  ZHANG Chang-hua  JI Yu  YUAN You-bo  QU yong-sheng  ZOU Yan
Institution:1.Guizhou Tobacco Institute;Guiyang;Guizhou 550003;2.Meitan Tobacco Monopoly Bureau;Meitan;Guizhou 564100;3.Shanghai Tobacco Group;Yangpu;Shanghai 200082;China
Abstract:The agronomic and economic characters,exterior quality and internal quality of K326,NC82 and Yunyan 87 were evaluated by the pairing method to provide the decision-making basis for selecting flue-cured tobacco varieties in Meitan base.The results showed that the comprehensive performance of agronomic characters of K326 was the best,and NC82 was the worst.The yield of three tested varieties was similar but Yunyan 87 had the highest output value(1 468.06 Yuan/667m2) in three tested varieties.The exterior qual...
Keywords:flue-cured tobacco  variety  difference  evaluation  Meitan  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号