首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

新疆主栽油杏品种综合性状评价
引用本文:李利民,徐麟,马凯,张大海,何峰江,唐章虎,樊国全.新疆主栽油杏品种综合性状评价[J].西北农业学报,2008,17(1):278-281.
作者姓名:李利民  徐麟  马凯  张大海  何峰江  唐章虎  樊国全
作者单位:1. 新疆农业科学院科研管理处,乌鲁木齐,830091
2. 新疆农业科学院轮台国家果树资源圃,新疆轮台,841600
3. 新疆农业科学院园艺所,乌鲁木齐,830091
基金项目:科技部农村科技服务体系建设项目“杏专家大院技术开发与示范”(2003EA890019).
摘    要:应用DTOPSIS法,根据平均单果重、仁重、可溶性固形物、总糖、维生素C、水不溶性固形物、脂肪、蛋白质、可食率、出仁率、肉干鲜比、核重、总酸14个指标,从商品性的角度出发,对新疆主栽的10个油杏品种进行了综合评价.结果表明,赛买提杏值最高(0.69),综合评价最好,居第一位;莎车洪待克值最低(0.27),综合评价居最后一位.各品种综合评价排序为:赛买提杏>阿克达拉孜>佳娜丽>乔尔胖>库买提>皮乃孜>阿克牙格勒克>卡拉阿藏>索格佳娜丽>莎车洪待克.综合评价结果与生产实践中各品种实际表现相一致.用DTOPSIS法对杏品种进行综合评价,比用单一性状(如单果重、可溶性固形物含量)进行方差分析更为合理,并就此法在杏品种综合评价中应注意的有关问题进行了探讨.

关 键 词:DTOPSIS法  杏品种  综合评价  新疆  杏品种  综合评价  性状评价  DTOPSIS  Method  of  Apricot  Xinjiang  问题  方差分析  固形物含量  可溶性  单果重  单一性  表现  实践  生产  卡拉  阿克达  拉孜
文章编号:1004-1389(2008)01-0278-04
收稿时间:2007-07-28
修稿时间:2007-09-20

Comprehengsive Judgement of Xinjiang Apricot with the Method of DTOPSIS
LI Li-min,XU Lin,MA Kai,ZHANG Da-hai,HE Feng-jiang,TANG Zhang-hu and FAN Guo-quan.Comprehengsive Judgement of Xinjiang Apricot with the Method of DTOPSIS[J].Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica,2008,17(1):278-281.
Authors:LI Li-min  XU Lin  MA Kai  ZHANG Da-hai  HE Feng-jiang  TANG Zhang-hu and FAN Guo-quan
Institution:Scientific Adminstration Division of Xinjiang Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China;State Fruit Tree Resource Garden of Luntai, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Luntai 841600, China;Institute of Horticultural Crops, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China;Institute of Horticultural Crops, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China;Institute of Horticultural Crops, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China;Institute of Horticultural Crops, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China;Institute of Horticultural Crops, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China
Abstract:The method of DTOPSIS was used to integrately evaluate Xinjiang apricot varieties by fruit weight,stone weight,content of total sugar etcs.The results showed that the value of Saimaiti is the highest,which occupies the first places;the value of Shachehongdaike is the smallest,which occupies the final places.The order of comprehengsive judgement for all varieties is Saimaiti>Akedalazi>Jianali>Qiaoerpang>Kumaiti>Pinaizi>Akeyageleke>Kalazang> Suogejianali >Shacehongdaike.The comprehengsive judgement results of all varieties is consistent with the actual behaviour in producing practice.DTOPSIS was more reasonable for evaluating apricot varieties than only yield single property analysis.And furher application of the integrated evaluation of apricot varieties with the method of DTOPSIS was discussed.
Keywords:Method of DTOPSIS  Variety of apricot  Integrated evaluation
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《西北农业学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《西北农业学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号