首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

不同土壤坡面细沟侵蚀差异与其影响因素
引用本文:陈俊杰,孙莉英,蔡崇法,刘俊体,蔡强国.不同土壤坡面细沟侵蚀差异与其影响因素[J].土壤学报,2013,50(2):281-288.
作者姓名:陈俊杰  孙莉英  蔡崇法  刘俊体  蔡强国
作者单位:1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,陆地水循环与地表过程重点实验室,北京 100101;华中农业大学水土保持研究中心,武汉430070
2. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,陆地水循环与地表过程重点实验室,北京 100101
3. 华中农业大学水土保持研究中心,武汉,430070
4. 北京林业大学水土保持学院,北京,100083
基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上基金项目 (40971165)、国家自然科学基金面上基金项目 (41271304)资助
摘    要:采用室内纯净水人工模拟降雨试验,在坡度为10°、15°、20°、25°坡面,土槽为5 m、10 m两种规格,对两种土壤((土娄)土与黄绵土)分别进行雨强为1.5 mm min-1,的降雨实验,利用三维激光扫描仪对每一场降雨后的坡面进行监测,分析不同坡度对细沟侵蚀的影响,比较两种土壤坡面细沟侵蚀的差异,以及其差异的影响因子.结果表明:(土娄)土土壤颗粒以粉粒与黏粒为主,粉粒占总质量的64.12%,黏粒为28.42%.黄绵土的土壤颗粒以粉粒为主占总质量的67.95%,黏粒与沙粒含量较少,黏粒占14.52%,沙粒占17.53%.在相同条件下,(土娄)土降雨过程中人渗缓慢,产流时间、坡面流速均快于黄绵土,跌坎出现时间也较早,使其更容易产生细沟.(土娄)土的径流量高于黄绵土,在降雨过程中,径流稳定时间较早.(土娄)土侵蚀量高于黄绵土,(土娄)土产沙率呈增加趋势,黄绵土含沙量变化不明显.从坡面细沟发育来看,(土娄)土坡面细沟成平行状分布,黄绵土细沟为较宽树枝状.

关 键 词:土壤  径流量  侵蚀量  细沟发育  人工模拟降雨
收稿时间:2012/4/15 0:00:00
修稿时间:2012/9/26 0:00:00

Rill erosion on different soil slopes and their affecting factors
Chen Junjie,Sun Liying,Cai Chongf,Liu Junti and Cai Qiangguo.Rill erosion on different soil slopes and their affecting factors[J].Acta Pedologica Sinica,2013,50(2):281-288.
Authors:Chen Junjie  Sun Liying  Cai Chongf  Liu Junti and Cai Qiangguo
Institution:Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Processes, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research,Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Processes, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research,Research Center of Water and Soil Conservation, Huazhong Agricultural University,Beijing forestry university school of soil and water conservation and Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Processes, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research
Abstract:Indoor simulation of rainfall, 1.5 mm min-1 in intensity was conducted using deionized water on slopes of Lou soil and Cultivated loessial soil, 10°, 15°, 20° and 25° in slope degree, and 5 m and 10 m in shope length,separately. Changes in the slopes caused by each rainfall event were monitored with a 3D laser scanner and analyzed for impact of slope degree on rill erosion, differences between slopes of different soils in rill erosion and their affecting factors. Results show that as the Lou soil is dominated with silt and clay in texture with silt content being 64.12% and clay content 18.42, and the Cultivated loessial soil composed mainly with silt (67.95%) and some clay (14.52%) and sand (17.53%), under the same conditions, rian water infiltration rate was lower, runoff generation earlier and runoff velocity higher in the former than in the latter, and as a result, erosion holes occurred earlier and rills formed more easily in the former. During the rainfall event, higher in volume, the runoff stabilized earlier in the former than in the latter. As the erosion rate was higher in the former, silt yield tended to increase, while it remained almost unchanged in the latter. Comparison between the slopes of two different soils in rill development shows that the rills on the Lou soil slopes were distributed in parallel, while those on of the Cultivated loessial soil slopes looked like wide tree branches.
Keywords:Soil  Runoff  Erosion  Rill development  Simulated rainfall
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《土壤学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《土壤学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号