首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Determination of baseline susceptibility of European populations of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) to indoxacarb and chlorantraniliprole using a novel dip bioassay method
Authors:Emmanouil Roditakis  Christina Skarmoutsou  Marianna Staurakaki  María del Rosario Martínez‐Aguirre  Lidia García‐Vidal  Pablo Bielza  Khalid Haddi  Carmelo Rapisarda  Jean‐Luc Rison  Andrea Bassi  Luis A Teixeira
Affiliation:1. National Agricultural Research Foundation (NAGREF), Plant Protection Institute of Heraklion, , Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece;2. Departamento de Producción Vegetal, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena (UPCT), , Cartagena, Spain;3. Department of Agri‐food and Environmental Systems Management, Applied Entomology Section, University of Catania (UC), , Catania, Italy;4. DuPont de Nemours ERDC, , Nambsheim, France;5. DuPont Italia Srl, , Cernusco sul Naviglio, MI, Italy;6. DuPont Crop Protection, Stine Haskell Research Center, , Newark, DE, USA
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Tuta absoluta(Meyrick) is one of the most serious pests of tomato recently introduced in the Mediterranean region. A novel bioassay method designed for the accurate determination of insecticide toxicity on T. absoluta (IRAC method No. 022) was validated by three different laboratories [Greece (NAGREF), Italy (UC) and Spain (UPCT)] on European populations. RESULTS: The insecticides indoxacarb and chlorantraniliprole were used as reference products. The IRAC leaf dip method is easy to perform, producing repeatable, homogeneous responses. LC50 values for indoxacarb ranged between 1.8 and 17.9 mg L?1 (NAGREF), 0.93 and 10.8 mg L?1 (UC) and 0.20 and 0.70 mg L?1 (UPCT), resulting in a tenfold, 12‐fold and fourfold difference between the least and most susceptible populations at each laboratory respectively. For chlorantraniliprole, LC50 values ranged between 0.10 and 0.56 mg L?1 (NAGREF), 0.23 and 1.34 mg L?1 (UC) and 0.04 and 0.24 mg L?1 (UPCT), resulting in a sixfold difference in all three cases. Overall, UPCT reported lower mean LC50 to indoxacarb, while UC reported higher LC50 to chlorantraniliprole. CONCLUSIONS: The new bioassay is reliable, providing a useful tool in the design of IRM strategies. Within each country/lab, the variability observed in the results for both indoxacarb and chlorantraniliprole can be attributed to natural variation. Future research is necessary to determine the extent to which it is possible to compare results among laboratories. Copyright © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry
Keywords:Tuta absoluta  indoxacarb  chlorantraniliprole  baseline toxicity  leaf dip assay  Greece  Italy  Spain
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号