首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Key Attributes Influence the Performance of Local Weed Management Programs in the Southwest United States
Institution:1. Assistant Manager, NRCS Tucson Plant Materials Center, 3241 N. Romero Road, Tucson, AZ 85705-9223, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721;2. Assistant Professor, Department of Forest, Rangeland, and Watershed Stewardship, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1472;3. Professor and Extension Specialist, School of Natural Resources, University of Arizona, 325 Biosciences East, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721;1. Great Lakes Research Center, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, United States;2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, United States;3. University of Michigan, Water Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States;4. Michigan Tech Research Institute, Michigan Technological University, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
Abstract:In the southwestern United States, local weed management programs are increasingly important in weed prevention and control; however, little is known about the effectiveness of different local approaches to weed management. We surveyed coordinators of 53 local weed management programs in Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Utah to determine how 4 key program attributes (interagency coordination, volunteer participation, regulatory authority and enforcement, and the state in which the program was located) were related with 4 performance measures: weed control, public education and outreach, weed monitoring, and integrated weed management. Based on the responses of 42 program coordinators (79%) we found that 1) weed programs that coordinated their activities with other organizations and those with citizen volunteers conducted more monitoring, but programs that did not coordinate or use volunteers treated more of their infested acreage; 2) programs that used a light-handed regulatory approach conducted more weed control than those with more punitive enforcement regimes or no enforcement authority; and 3) Colorado programs conducted more outreach and education than did programs in the other 3 states. Thus, although volunteer involvement and interagency coordination contributed to the performance of the local weed programs studied, particularly in monitoring, they have not compensated for the lack of locally enforceable weed regulations or adequate funding. Successful weed management in southwestern United States will require adequately funded, locally adapted approaches supported by locally enforceable weed regulations.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号