首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Effects of Wildlife on Cattle Diets in Laikipia Rangeland,Kenya
Institution:1. Authors are PhD candidate, Natural Resource Management Dept, Egerton University, PO Box 536, Njoro, Kenya, and Research Scientist, Mpala Research Centre, PO Box 555, Nanyuki, Kenya;2. Professor, Dept of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, and Research Scientist, Mpala Research Centre, PO Box 555, Nanyuki, Kenya;3. Senior Lecturer, School of Environmental Studies, Biological Sciences Division, Moi University, PO Box 3900, Eldoret, Kenya;1. Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9NT, UK;2. Chester Zoo, Caughall Road, Upton-by-Chester CH2 1LH, UK;3. Centre for African Conservation Ecology, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, PO Box 77000, NMMU, Port Elizabeth, 6031, South Africa;4. Gamka Mountain Nature Reserve, Western Cape Nature Conservation Board, Oudtshoorn 6620, South Africa
Abstract:The impacts of wild herbivores on cattle diet selection were investigated in an East African rangeland during August 2001 and February 2002. The study compared cattle diets in plots exclusively accessible to cattle (C) and those accessible to megaherbivores (elephants and giraffes), non-megaherbivore wild herbivores > 15 kg (zebras, hartebeests, Grant's gazelles, oryx, elands, and buffaloes) and cattle (MWC); or non-megaherbivore wild herbivores and cattle (WC). There were no treatment differences in selection of most grass species in either sampling period (P > 0.05). However, selection of forbs differed among treatments during February when conditions were relatively dry and percent of bites taken by cattle on this forage class increased (P < 0.005) from 1.8% ± 0.3 to 7.7% ± 1.6 (mean ± SE). During this period, cattle took a lower percent of bites on forbs in MWC (4.3% ± 1.7; P = 0.01) and WC (5.9% ± 2.2; P = 0.03) than in C (12.9% ± 0.9). These patterns were generally driven by Commelina spp., which comprised 65% ± 9.4 of total bites on forbs. Notably, these differences were associated with differences in cover of forbs, which was positively correlated with percent of bites on forbs (r2 = 0.86, P < 0.01). Because forbs may be critical components of cattle diets in such rangelands during relatively dry periods, these dietary changes may indicate potential seasonal costs of wildlife to cattle production. Looking for ways to offset such costs may be worthwhile for livestock properties that accommodate wildlife.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号