| 苹果腐烂病药剂对比试验 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 卜海东,刘延杰,张武杰,程显敏,顾广军. 苹果腐烂病药剂对比试验[J]. 北方园艺, 2011, 0(1): 171-172 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 卜海东 刘延杰 张武杰 程显敏 顾广军 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 黑龙江省农业科学院牡丹江分院,黑龙江牡丹江,157041;黑龙江省农业科学院牡丹江分院,黑龙江牡丹江,157041;黑龙江省农业科学院牡丹江分院,黑龙江牡丹江,157041;黑龙江省农业科学院牡丹江分院,黑龙江牡丹江,157041;黑龙江省农业科学院牡丹江分院,黑龙江牡丹江,157041 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资金资助项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 采用腐迪、菌清、佰明98灵和果树腐烂病康复剂等4种不同药剂作为苹果腐烂病对比试验的药剂。结果表明:菌清是最好的抗腐烂病药剂,株数的防治效果可达73.7%,块数的防治效果可达66.7%。建议生产上采用菌清作为防治腐烂病的药剂。
|
| 关 键 词： | 苹果树腐烂病 药剂 对比试验 |
Field Effect Comparison of Pharmacy to Apple Canker |
| |
| BU Hai-dong,LIU Yan-jie,ZHANG Wu-jie,CHENG Xian-min,GU Guang-jun. Field Effect Comparison of Pharmacy to Apple Canker[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2011, 0(1): 171-172 |
| |
| Authors: | BU Hai-dong LIU Yan-jie ZHANG Wu-jie CHENG Xian-min GU Guang-jun |
| |
| Affiliation: | BU Hai-dong,LIU Yan-jie,ZHANG Wu-jie,CHENG Xian-min,GU Guang-jun(Mudanjiang Branch Institute,Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Mudanjiang,Heilongjiang 157041) |
| |
| Abstract: | Four different pharmacy were used for apple canker field effect comparison,such as Fudi,Junqing,Baiming98ling,Fruittree recure agent.The results showed that the control effects of Junqing was the best,the control effect of which were 73.7% and 66.7%.It was suggested that Junqing should be used to control the canker in practice. |
| |
| Keywords: | apple tree canker pharmacy field effect comparison |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
