首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

桂江鱼类物种组成及其群落时空变化格局的研究
引用本文:尹超,黄健,黄亮亮,吴志强,邓明星,徐莉,高明慧. 桂江鱼类物种组成及其群落时空变化格局的研究[J]. 水生态学杂志, 2019, 40(5): 48-54
作者姓名:尹超  黄健  黄亮亮  吴志强  邓明星  徐莉  高明慧
作者单位:桂林理工大学 环境科学与工程学院,广西 桂林541004;桂林理工大学 岩溶地区水污染控制与用水安全保障协同创新中心,广西 桂林541004;,桂林理工大学 环境科学与工程学院,广西 桂林 541004;桂林理工大学 广西环境污染控制理论与技术重点实验室, 广西 桂林541004;,桂林理工大学 环境科学与工程学院,广西 桂林 541004;桂林理工大学 广西环境污染控制理论与技术重点实验室, 广西 桂林541004;,桂林理工大学 岩溶地区水污染控制与用水安全保障协同创新中心,广西 桂林541004;广西大学,广西 南宁 530004,桂林理工大学 岩溶地区水污染控制与用水安全保障协同创新中心,广西 桂林541004;桂林理工大学 广西环境污染控制理论与技术重点实验室, 广西 桂林541004;,桂林理工大学 岩溶地区水污染控制与用水安全保障协同创新中心,广西 桂林541004;桂林理工大学 广西环境污染控制理论与技术重点实验室, 广西 桂林541004;,桂林理工大学 环境科学与工程学院,广西 桂林541004;桂林理工大学 岩溶地区水污染控制与用水安全保障协同创新中心,广西 桂林541004;
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(51509042);广西自然科学基金(2016GXNFAA380104);广西自然科学基金(2018GXNFAA281022);广西“八桂学者”岗位专项经费
摘    要:为探究桂江鱼类群落结构现状,保护桂江鱼类物种多样性,于2015年1月(冬)、4月(春)、7月(夏)和10月(秋),对桂江平乐(S1)、昭平(S2)、五将(S3)、马江(S4)、木格(S5)、大郎(S6)、京南(S7)、倒水(S8)、梧州(S9)共计9个采样点,进行4次鱼类资源调查。分析了桂江鱼类物种组成、优势种和鱼类群落结构的时空变化;结果表明,本次调查共采集鱼类93种,隶属于6目、17科、 66属,其中以鲤形目为主(63种),占总种数的67.74%。鱼类相对多度(Relative density)显示,全年优势种为?(Hemiculter leucisculus),占总个体数的12.75%。不同季节的优势种有差异,冬季优势种为伍氏半?(Hemiculterella wui)、?和宽鳍鱲(Zacco platypus);春季优势种不明显,个体数较多的有南方拟?(Pseudohemiculter dispar)和泥鳅(Misgurnus anguillicaudatus);夏季优势种为?、大眼华鳊(Sinibrama macrops)和南方拟?;秋季优势种为?、莫桑比克罗非鱼(Tilapia mossambicus)和尼罗罗非鱼(T. niloticus)。无度量多维排序图(NMDS)和单因素相似性分析(ANOSIM)结果显示,除夏季与秋季之间外(P=0.178>0.05),其余季节之间鱼类群落结构存在显著性差异(P<0.05),这可能是珠江水系鱼类繁殖期(4-6月)及降水的季节性变化所致。采样点S1与S7、S8、S9,S6与S7、S8、S9,S2与S6、S9之间存在显著性差异。目前河流库区化、过度开采以及外来物种入侵是导致鱼类群落结构变化的主要原因。

关 键 词:鱼类;物种组成;时空变化;桂江
收稿时间:2017-11-18
修稿时间:2019-09-16

Species Composition and Temporal-spatial Variation of the Fish Community in Guijiang River
YIN Chao,HUANG Jian,HUANG Liang-liang,WU Zhi-qiang,DENG Ming-xing,XU Li and GAO Ming-hui. Species Composition and Temporal-spatial Variation of the Fish Community in Guijiang River[J]. Journal of Hydroecology, 2019, 40(5): 48-54
Authors:YIN Chao  HUANG Jian  HUANG Liang-liang  WU Zhi-qiang  DENG Ming-xing  XU Li  GAO Ming-hui
Abstract:Guijiang River is the primary tributary of Xijiang River, with a total length of 438 km and water area of 18,790 km2. In this study, we investigated the current status of fish resources in Xijiang River, focusing the field investigation on species composition, dominant species and spatio-temporal variations. The objectives were to provide scientific evidence for conserving biodiversity, sustainable development of fish resources and support the evaluation of river system health. In January, April, July and October of 2015, the investigation was conducted at nine sampling sites, representing different habitats; Pingle (S1), Zhaoping (S2), Wujang (S3), Majiang (S4), Muge (S5), Dalang (S6), Jingnan (S7), Daoshui (S8), Wuzhou (S9). Fish samples were collected using portable fishing equipment and nets, and all fish collected were identified by species. A total of 93 fish species were collected, falling into 166 genera, 7 families and 6 orders. Cypriniformes (63 species, 3 families) dominated the fish collected, accounting for 67.74% of the total species, followed by Perciformes (15 species, 8 families, 16.13%), Siluriformes (12 species, 3 families, 12.90%), Synbranchiformes (1species, 1 family, 1.07%), Anguilliformes (1 species, 1 family, 1.07%) and Cyprinodontiformes (1 species, 1 family, 1.07%). Hemiculter leucisculus was the most dominant species over the study period [relative density (RD) of 12.75%], but the dominant species varied with season; : Hemiculterella wui, Hemiculter leucisculus and Zacco platypus in winter; Hemiculter leucisculus, Sinibrama macrops and Pseudohemiculter dispar in summer; Hemiculter leucisculus, Tilapia mossambicus and Tilapia niloticus in autumn and no dominant species evident in spring. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination and one-way analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) showed that the fish community structure varied significantly with season (P<0.05), except for between summer (July) and autumn (October) (P=0.178>0.05). Structural differences were attributed to the effects of breeding season in the Pearl River (April-June) and seasonal variation in precipitation along the Guijiang River. Spatially, there were significant differences in the fish community between S1 and S7, S1 and S8, S1 and S9; S6 and S7, S6 and S8, S6 and S9; S2 and S6, S2 and S9. The static and deep water environment of reservoir after hydropower development, and alien species invasion were the primary factors leading to spatial changes in fish community structure.
Keywords:fish species   species composition   temporal and spatial variation   Guijiang River
点击此处可从《水生态学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《水生态学杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号