首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于无人机数码影像和高光谱数据的冬小麦产量估算对比
引用本文:陶惠林,冯海宽,杨贵军,杨小冬,苗梦珂,吴智超,翟丽婷.基于无人机数码影像和高光谱数据的冬小麦产量估算对比[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(23):111-118.
作者姓名:陶惠林  冯海宽  杨贵军  杨小冬  苗梦珂  吴智超  翟丽婷
作者单位:1. 农业农村部农业遥感机理与定量遥感重点实验室,北京农业信息技术研究中心,北京 100097; 2. 安徽理工大学测绘学院,淮南 232001; 3. 国家农业信息化工程技术研究中心,北京 100097; 4. 北京市农业物联网工程技术研究中心,北京 100097;,1. 农业农村部农业遥感机理与定量遥感重点实验室,北京农业信息技术研究中心,北京 100097; 3. 国家农业信息化工程技术研究中心,北京 100097; 4. 北京市农业物联网工程技术研究中心,北京 100097;,1. 农业农村部农业遥感机理与定量遥感重点实验室,北京农业信息技术研究中心,北京 100097; 3. 国家农业信息化工程技术研究中心,北京 100097; 4. 北京市农业物联网工程技术研究中心,北京 100097;,1. 农业农村部农业遥感机理与定量遥感重点实验室,北京农业信息技术研究中心,北京 100097; 3. 国家农业信息化工程技术研究中心,北京 100097; 4. 北京市农业物联网工程技术研究中心,北京 100097;,1. 农业农村部农业遥感机理与定量遥感重点实验室,北京农业信息技术研究中心,北京 100097; 3. 国家农业信息化工程技术研究中心,北京 100097; 4. 北京市农业物联网工程技术研究中心,北京 100097; 5. 河南理工大学测绘与国土信息工程学院,焦作 454000;,1. 农业农村部农业遥感机理与定量遥感重点实验室,北京农业信息技术研究中心,北京 100097; 3. 国家农业信息化工程技术研究中心,北京 100097; 4. 北京市农业物联网工程技术研究中心,北京 100097; 5. 河南理工大学测绘与国土信息工程学院,焦作 454000;,1. 农业农村部农业遥感机理与定量遥感重点实验室,北京农业信息技术研究中心,北京 100097; 3. 国家农业信息化工程技术研究中心,北京 100097; 4. 北京市农业物联网工程技术研究中心,北京 100097; 5. 河南理工大学测绘与国土信息工程学院,焦作 454000;
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(41601346,41871333)
摘    要:作物产量准确估算在农业生产中具有重要意义。该文利用无人机获取冬小麦挑旗期、开花期和灌浆期数码影像和高光谱数据,并实测产量。首先利用无人机数码影像和高光谱数据分别提取数码影像指数和光谱参数,然后将数码影像指数和光谱参数与冬小麦产量作相关性分析,挑选出相关性较好的9个指数和参数,最后以选取的数码影像指数和光谱参数为建模因子,通过MLR(multiple linear regression,MLR)和RF(random forest,RF)对产量进行估算。结果表明:数码影像指数和光谱参数与实测产量均有很强的相关性。利用数码影像指数和光谱参数通过MLR和RF构建的产量估算模型均在灌浆期表现精度最高,在灌浆期,数码影像指数和光谱参数构建的MLR模型R~2和NRMSE分别为0.71、12.79%,0.77、10.32%。对模型对比分析可知,以光谱参数为因子的MLR模型精度较高,更适合用于估算冬小麦产量。利用无人机遥感数据,通过光谱参数建立的MLR模型能够快速、方便地对作物进行产量预测,并可以根据不同生育期的产量估算模型有效地对作物进行监测。

关 键 词:无人机  数码影像  高光谱  冬小麦  产量  估算  多元线性回归  随机森林
收稿时间:2019/7/18 0:00:00
修稿时间:2019/10/24 0:00:00

Comparison of winter wheat yields estimated with UAV digital image and hyperspectral data
Tao Huilin,Feng Haikuan,Yang Guijun,Yang Xiaodong,Miao Mengke,Wu Zhichao and Zhai Liting.Comparison of winter wheat yields estimated with UAV digital image and hyperspectral data[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2019,35(23):111-118.
Authors:Tao Huilin  Feng Haikuan  Yang Guijun  Yang Xiaodong  Miao Mengke  Wu Zhichao and Zhai Liting
Institution:1. Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China; 2.School of Geodesy and Geomatics, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001,China; 3. National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China; 4. Beijing Engineering Research Center for Agriculture Internet of Things, Beijing 100097, China;,1. Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China; 3. National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China; 4. Beijing Engineering Research Center for Agriculture Internet of Things, Beijing 100097, China;,1. Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China; 3. National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China; 4. Beijing Engineering Research Center for Agriculture Internet of Things, Beijing 100097, China;,1. Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China; 3. National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China; 4. Beijing Engineering Research Center for Agriculture Internet of Things, Beijing 100097, China;,1. Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China; 3. National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China; 4. Beijing Engineering Research Center for Agriculture Internet of Things, Beijing 100097, China; 5.School of Surveying and land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China;,1. Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China; 3. National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China; 4. Beijing Engineering Research Center for Agriculture Internet of Things, Beijing 100097, China; 5.School of Surveying and land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China; and 1. Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China; 3. National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China; 4. Beijing Engineering Research Center for Agriculture Internet of Things, Beijing 100097, China; 5.School of Surveying and land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China;
Abstract:Accurate estimation of crops yield is of great significance in agricultural production and has a strong guiding significance for agricultural managers. It is necessary to use an effective technical means to estimate the yield of field crops quickly and accurately. Taking winter wheat in Xiaotangshan National Precision Agricultural Research Demonstration Base as the research object, this study compared the performance of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) digital image and hyperspectral data in winter wheat yield estimation. The field surveys and campaigns were conducted in three typical winter wheat growth stages including flagging, flowering and filling stages. The digital images and hyperspectral data were respectively acquired by digital camera and Cubert UHD 185 Firefly imaging spectrometer, which were mounted on a UAV platform. The wheat yield data were collected during harvest. Firstly, the typical digital image indices and hyperspectral parameters were extracted from UAV digital image and hyperspectral data, respectively. Then the correlation analyses between wheat measured yield and digital image indices and hyperspectral parameters were carried out. Nine digital image indices and hyperspectral parameters with high correlation were selected for each growth stages, respectively. The selected digital image indices and hyperspectral parameters were used as modeling factors and the yield were estimated by multiple linear regression (MLR) and random forest (RF), and the models constructed by the two remote sensing data were compared to optimize the remote sensing data and model. The results showed that the digital image indices and hyperspectral parameters had significant correlation with the wheat measured yield. Among them, the correlation of the best index of different growth stages was the reflectance of the red and the best hyperspectral parameter of the three growth stages were transformed chlorophyll absorption reflectance index optimized soil adjusted vegetation index (TCARI/OSAVI), simple ratio vegetation (SR), and TCARI/OSAVI, respectively. Through the digital image indices, analyzing the effect of the modeling set, the accuracy of the MLR model was significantly better than the RF model in different growth stages, and the estimation accuracy of the two models was the highest during the filling stage and the lowest during the flagging stage. The best R2 of the MLR model was 0.71 (RMSE = 730.66 kg/hm2, NRMSE = 12.79%), and the best R2 of the RF model was 0.57 (RMSE = 894.16 kg/hm2, NRMSE = 15.65%), indicating that the advantages of the MLR model were more obvious. MLR and RF model verification effect and modeling effect remain the same. The performance of MLR and RF models had gradually increased to the filling stage to achieve the best. NRMSE reached 13.56% and 17.22%, respectively. The yield effect was estimated based on the spectral index. For MLR and RF models, the accuracy of model modeling was gradually improved, and the fitting effect was getting better and better. Among them, the best R2 of the MLR model was 0.77 and the NRMSE was 10.32%; the best R2 of the MLR model was 0.61, NRMSE was 14.79%, the estimation accuracy of MLR model was better than RF model in different growth stages. As the growth stage progresses, the verification R2 gradually increased, and RMSE and NRMSE gradually decreased. This result was consistent with the effect of the modeling set, indicating that the validation effect was relatively stable. So using UAV hyperspectral remote sensing data, the estimation model of winter wheat yield established by the MLR method can quickly and easily predict the yield of crops, and can effectively monitor the growth of crops and the performance of yield estimation models in different growth stages.
Keywords:UAV  digital image  hyperspectral  winter wheat  yield  estimation  partial least squares  random forest
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《农业工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《农业工程学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号