首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于可见/近红外光谱识别东北地区常见木材
引用本文:汪紫阳,尹世逵,李颖,李耀翔.基于可见/近红外光谱识别东北地区常见木材[J].浙江农林大学学报,2019,36(1):162-169.
作者姓名:汪紫阳  尹世逵  李颖  李耀翔
作者单位:东北林业大学 工程技术学院, 黑龙江 哈尔滨 150040
基金项目:国家林业公益性行业科研专项201504508"十三五"国家重点研发计划项目2017YFC0504103
摘    要:探索可见/近红外光谱识别生长锥取得的木材样品的可行性,为野外木材检测提供方法。木材品种涉及东北地区常见的14个树种,木材样品由生长锥南向北方向钻取树木1.3 m胸高处得到,观测木样的可见/近红外光谱并采用导数、对数与平滑处理,运用距离法建立识别模型,测试并分析不同光谱预处理方法对可见/近红外光谱木材识别准确率的影响。结果显示:在不使用平滑处理时,使用一阶导数处理之后的光谱木材树种识别的准确率(96.79%)明显高于二阶导数(78.57%)和三阶导数(75.00%)。在使用导数和平滑处理时,使用二阶导数(98.21%)或三阶导数(98.21%)处理之后的光谱用于识别的准确率略高于一阶导数(97.50%)。单独使用平滑处理不能提高模型预测准确率,单独使用导数处理可以提高模型预测准确率。在最优的参数设置下使用导数和平滑处理时,使用S-G导数平滑(98.42%)和Norris导数滤波(98.57%)的效果无明显差异。

关 键 词:木材学    可见/近红外    树种识别    生长锥
收稿时间:2018-02-01

Identification of common wood species in northeast China using Vis/NIR spectroscopy
WANG Ziyang,YIN Shikui,LI Ying,LI Yaoxiang.Identification of common wood species in northeast China using Vis/NIR spectroscopy[J].Journal of Zhejiang A&F University,2019,36(1):162-169.
Authors:WANG Ziyang  YIN Shikui  LI Ying  LI Yaoxiang
Institution:College of Engineering & Technology, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, Heilongjiang, China
Abstract:To determine the feasibility of using visible/near infrared spectroscopy to identify wood samples drilled using an increment borer, and to provide a method of wood identification in the wild, 14 wood species typically found in Northeast China were sampled and drilled with an increment borer through 1.3 m breast-height of the trees from south to north, the samples are about 300 mm in length and 5 mm in diameter. Analysis included use of derivative, logarithmic, and smooth processing to process the wood spectrum and used a distance method to build the identification model. Results showed that without smoothing, the accuracy rate of the first derivative (96.79%) was much better than the second derivative (78.57%) and the third derivative (75.00%). With derivative and smoothing, the accuracy rate of the second derivative + smoothing (98.21%) and the third derivative + smoothing (98.21%) were better than the first derivative + smoothing (97.50%). Accuracy rate of the prediction model was not improved with just smoothing, and the derivative pretreatment improved accuracy. Also, with optimum parameters, there were no major differences between S-G derivative smoothing (98.42%) and the Norris derivative filter (98.57%). Thus, this study provided a new method and idea for rapid identification of wood species.
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《浙江农林大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《浙江农林大学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号