Comparison of isoflurane and halothane as inhalation anaesthetics in the dog

Summary

A number of clinically important features of isoflurane anaesthesia were studied in comparison to those of halothane. Two groups of dogs were used. After light premedication, anaesthesia was induced by mask, and both groups of dogs were maintained for 30 minutes at 1.5 × MAC value of either halothane or isoflurane in a combination of oxygen and nitrous oxide (50:50). All animals were ventilating spontaneously.

There was no difference in the speed of induction of the halothane and isoflurane groups. Blood pressure in both groups dropped to approximately 7.5 kPa (56 mm Hg) during maintenance anesthesia (1.5 MAC), while the heart rate was significantly higher in the isoflurane group. Individual respiratory variables were not significantly different between the two groups, however the differences between the trends of the mean values were significant (Sign‐test). In general, with isoflurane, respiration rates were lower, with the tidal volume and end tidal CO₂ being greater.

The trends in pH and arterial pCO₂ showed a slightly more severe respiratory acidosis in the isoflurane group. However, neither group showed values corresponding to any expected clinical problems. Speed of recovery (determined by times to head‐lift and righting‐reflex) was greater in the isoflurane group. Previously known important features of isoflurane are low biodegradability, low blood: gas partition coefficient, and decreased myocardial sensitivity to catecholamines. It is concluded from this study that isoflurane deserves a place in canine anesthesia whenever these specific pharmacologic properties are desired.