Prevalence of campylobacter in pigs during fattening; an epidemiological study |
| |
Authors: | M.J.B.M. Weljtens P.G.H. Bijker J. Van der Plas H.A.P. Urlings M.H. Biesheuvel |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of the science Food of Animal Origin, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine , Utrecht University , P.O. Box 80.175, Utrecht, 3508 TD, the Netherlands;2. TNO Nutrition and Food Research , P.O. Box 360, Zeist, 3700 AJ, the Netherlands;3. National Inspection Service for Livestock and Meat , P.O. Box 1112, Apeldoorn, 7301 BJ, the Netherlands |
| |
Abstract: | Summary Numerous epidemiological reports implicate foods of animal origin as vehicles of human campylobacteriosis. Pigs are probably an important reservoir of campylobacter and a potential source of human infection. In order to improve our knowledge of the epidemiology of campylobacter in pigs, the prevalence of campylobacter and its contamination of feed were monitored in eight pig farms. Faeces samples of pigs aged 11 and 22 weeks, and samples of rectal, ileal and gastric content at a slaughterhouse were collected for bacteriological examination. On 5 farms, subsequent groups of pigs housed in the same stalls was sampled, too. A selection of the campylobacter isolates was characterized with a genetic typing method (RFLP). More than 85% of the sampled porkers were shown to be intestinal carriers of campylobacter at all stages of fattening. Subsequent groups of pigs housed in the same stalls were all carriers, too. The level of campylobacters in the faeces tended to decrease as the pigs got older. There was no difference in the frequency and level of infection with campylobacter between porkers on different farms. The feeding system (wet feed versus dry pellets) did not seem to influence the prevalence of campylobacter although wet feed gave lower counts of Enterobacteriaceae in the faeces. RFLP‐typing showed a high diversity of campylobacter strains at each sampling on the farm. Similarities were seen between strains isolated during two subsequent samplings of the same group of pigs, but not between strains isolated on the same farm from subsequent groups of pigs housed in the same stall. This suggests that the piglets were already infected at a young age on the breeding farm. |
| |
Keywords: | Antibodies Bacterial diseases Cattle diseases Diagnostic tests ELISA Intestinal diseases Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis Paratuberculosis Prevalence Subclinical infections |
|
|