首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Revenue loss from legal timber in Indonesia
Institution:1. ARC Future Fellow, School of Geography, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia;2. Visiting Assistant Research Professor, Dept. of Human Ecology, SEBS, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA;3. Department of Forest and Nature Conservation Policy, Georg-August University Goettingen, Buesgenweg 3, 37077, Goettingen, Germany;1. Fenner School of Environment & Society, Australian National University, Building 141, Linnaeus Way, ACT 2601, Australia;2. Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, ACT 2601, Australia;3. National Research and Innovation Agency, Jakarta 10340, Indonesia
Abstract:The link between forest revenue administration and under performance of revenues from legal timber has received little attention in the literature. This article analyzes revenues from the timber royalty and reforestation fund fee, two important forest non-tax revenues in Indonesia whose tropical forest has been under threat of extensive deforestation particularly from commercial timber logging. It shows that revenue realization does not reflect potential with two key findings: first, timber royalty revenues represent only 52% of their potential, and second, revenues from reforestation fund fee suggest a counter-intuitive pattern – revenue realization is 34% above its potential. We provide plausible explanations from the perspective related to features of revenue collection. We further consider policy relevance in terms of forest revenue administration.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号