首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


A comparison of catch rates of artificial lures from an automated handline fishery at Shetland,UK
Authors:Paul Macdonald  Chevonne H. Laurenson  Arthur Johnson  Leslie Tait
Affiliation:1. Departamento de Genética, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela (USC), Campus de Lugo, 27002 Lugo, Spain;2. Departamento de Bioquímica, Genética e Inmunología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain;3. Instituto de Investigación y Formación Agraria y Pesquera de Andalucía (IFAPA), Centro Agua del Pino, Ctra. Cartaya-Puna Umbría s/n, 21450 Cartaya, Huelva, Spain;4. Departamento de Mejora Genética Animal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria, Ctra. Coruña Km 7.5, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Abstract:Automated handlining (jig fishing) has recently been trialled in waters around Shetland, UK. Although different types and colours of artificial lures are commercially available there is a paucity of information available on the effects of either lure design or lure colour on resulting catches. We compared the catch rates of (1) five colours of rubber eel tube lures; and (2) five different designs of artificial lure commonly used in handline fisheries. Lure colour did not significantly affect catches of pollack (Pollachius pollachius), saithe (Pollachius virens), cod (Gadus morhua), ling (Molva molva) or tusk (Brosme brosme). Cod showed a preference for lower hooks on the six hooks per reel set-up when lures were black and pollack showed a preference for lower hooks when the lures were blue. There were no significant differences in catches of saithe, cod, ling or tusk between the five lure types. However, catches of pollack on a novel ‘sonar’ lure were lower than on other lures. No evidence of a preference for any hook position on the reels was found with any of the lure types.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号