Transcutaneous monitor approximates PaCO(2) but not PaO(2) in anesthetized rabbits

ObjectiveTo compare the accuracy of transcutaneous (tc) to arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO₂) and partial pressure of oxygen (PaO₂) in anesthetized rabbits.Study designProspective, randomized, experimental study.AnimalsEight healthy adult female New Zealand white rabbits weighing 4.05 ± 0.30 kg.MethodsIsoflurane anesthetized rabbits received six treatments in random order; PaCO₂ < 35, 35-45, and >45 mmHg and PaO₂ < 80, 100-200, >200 mmHg. Arterial and transcutaneous measurements were taken after 15 minutes of stabilization at each condition. Linear regression, correlation and Bland-Altman analysis were performed to compare PtcCO₂ to PaCO₂ and PtcO₂ to PaO₂.ResultsOver a range of measured PaCO₂ values from 21 to 67 mmHg (n = 24) mean bias for PtcCO₂ was -1 mmHg and the 95% limits of agreement were -7 to 5 mmHg. The correlation between PtcCO₂ and PaCO₂ was strong with R² value of 0.9454. Over the entire range of measured PaO₂ values (46-508 mmHg) mean bias for PtcO₂ was -61 mmHg and the 95% limits of agreement were -226 to 104 mmHg. Correlation was poor with R² = 0.5969. Comparing PtcO₂ to PaO₂ over a narrower range PaO₂ < 150 mmHg (n = 13)] improved the correlation, with an R² value of 0.8518, mean bias of -7 mmHg and 95% limits of agreement from -33 to 19 mmHg.Conclusions and clinical relevanceIn healthy anesthetized rabbits, PtcCO₂ closely approximated PaCO₂. In contrast PtcO₂ underestimated PaO₂, particularly at high values. The PtcCO₂ sensor may be a useful noninvasive way to assess adequacy of ventilation in anesthetized rabbits.