| 水稻病原细菌鉴定方法的比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 谢关林.水稻病原细菌鉴定方法的比较研究[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2000,26(4):353-358. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 谢关林 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 浙江大学植物病害生物防治研究所,浙江,杭州,310029 |
| |
| 基金项目： | SupportedbyNationalFoundationofNaturalScienceofChina(No.39870 5 1 )andInternationalRiceResearchInstitute(IRRI). |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对Biolog细菌鉴定法（借助于计算机的数值分类法）、甲基脂肪酸气相色谱分析法（FAMEs）、基础细菌学、选择性培养基及致病性测定等方法鉴定18个水稻标准病原细菌进行了比较。Biolog 和FAMEs 鉴定细菌较可靠和快速，但由于目前水稻病原细菌的计算机数据库尚不完备，鉴定部分细菌需用其它补充方法。
|
| 关 键 词： | 病原细菌 水稻 Biolog细菌鉴定法 甲基脂肪酸气相色谱分析法 致病性测定 |
Comparison of different methods for identification of pathogenic bacteria from rice |
| |
| XIE Guan-lin.Comparison of different methods for identification of pathogenic bacteria from rice[J].Journal of Zhejiang University(Agriculture & Life Sciences),2000,26(4):353-358. |
| |
| Authors: | XIE Guan-lin |
| |
| Abstract: | Biolog (computer aided numeric taxonomy method), gas chromatographic analysis of fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs), basic bacteriology, selective media and pathogenicity test were compared for identification of 18 pathogenic bacteria from rice. Biolog and FAMEs were more believable and rapid methods. However, they need some complemental method for identification of some pathogenic bacteria due to their limited databases. Each method has its owns advantage and pitfalls. |
| |
| Keywords: | pathogenic bacteria rice biolog gas chromatographic analysis of fatty acid methyl esters pathogenicity test |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文 |
