当代陆羽研究之伪命题三例

本文认为当代一些好事者所谓"陆羽在余杭著《茶经》""陆羽终老于竟陵""陆羽、李冶青梅竹马是恋人"之论,均为伪命题。弘扬陆羽文化,尤其是作为学术研究,重要的是弘扬其精神,求真求实,知古鉴今,资政育人。而以地方利益为目的,对并无异议之史实,作出断章取义和牵强附会的所谓考据,纠结于另有著经之地、终老之地,除了添乱,毫无积极意义;至于无中生有虚构其恋爱情事,实为侵犯古人隐私,无聊而庸俗,亵渎"茶圣",作践自我。

Three Cases of Pseudo Propositions in Contemporary Lu Yu Studies

This paper,based on detailed historical data,points out that the so-called propositions that Lu Yu wrote Tea Classic in Yuhang,Lu Yu died in Jingling and Lu Yu and Li Ye were lovers are false.To carry forward Lu Yu culture,especially in academic study,it is important to advocate spirits,seek truth and reality,learn from the past and learn from the present,and enlighten and educate people.However,for the purpose of local interests,it is of no positive significance to make far-fetched textual research on undisputed historical facts,and to seek eagerly other places of origin and death.The quest of his fictitious love affairs is violation of the tea saint's privacy,boring and vulgar blasphemy for the tea saint and self-abasement.