首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

麦类品种与种质资源对大麦黄矮病毒GAV的田间抗性鉴定
引用本文:张华伟,Soumou Wansim Nadege,陶烨,宋爽,刘斐,吴云锋.麦类品种与种质资源对大麦黄矮病毒GAV的田间抗性鉴定[J].植物保护学报,2014,41(5):584-588.
作者姓名:张华伟  Soumou Wansim Nadege  陶烨  宋爽  刘斐  吴云锋
作者单位:西北农林科技大学植保学院, 旱区作物逆境生物学国家重点实验室, 农业部西北黄土高原作物有害生物综合治理重点实验室, 植保资源与病虫害治理教育部重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌712100;西北农林科技大学植保学院, 旱区作物逆境生物学国家重点实验室, 农业部西北黄土高原作物有害生物综合治理重点实验室, 植保资源与病虫害治理教育部重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌712100;西北农林科技大学植保学院, 旱区作物逆境生物学国家重点实验室, 农业部西北黄土高原作物有害生物综合治理重点实验室, 植保资源与病虫害治理教育部重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌712100;西北农林科技大学植保学院, 旱区作物逆境生物学国家重点实验室, 农业部西北黄土高原作物有害生物综合治理重点实验室, 植保资源与病虫害治理教育部重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌712100;咸阳市农业科学研究院, 陕西 咸阳712000;西北农林科技大学植保学院, 旱区作物逆境生物学国家重点实验室, 农业部西北黄土高原作物有害生物综合治理重点实验室, 植保资源与病虫害治理教育部重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌712100
基金项目:国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201303021),高等学校学科创新引智计划(B070409)
摘    要:为明确不同小麦品种对大麦黄矮病毒(Barley yellow dwarf viruses, BYDV)GAV的抗性差异,采用堆测法田间人工接种鉴定了215份小麦品种及种质资源的抗病性.结果表明,不同材料对黄矮病的抗病性存在较大差异,00中13、中4、西农979、临优21号、878和H9020-17-25-6-4的病情指数分别为18.9、9.6、16.3、21.1、21.1和22.6,表现出较好的抗病性;荔高6号、偃展4110、新麦13、豫麦49、徐麦856、金穗1号、中国春和7182的病情指数分别为68.9、55.2、58.5、54.0、56.2、51.5、55.8和53.0,均高于50.0,表现为高感;其余材料病情指数在25.0~50.0之间,表现为感病.此外,红须麦、豫麦34、小冰麦和晋麦47初期表现感病,后期恢复健康,有一定的耐病性.抗病性不同的小麦品种感染GAV后,对小麦产量的影响差异很大,抗病品种如中5产量损失为5.6%,中4产量损失7.6%,耐病品种小冰麦、晋麦47和红须麦的产量损失依次为19.9%、15.2%和18.3%,而感病品种荔高6号产量损失达到47.5%.

关 键 词:小麦黄矮病  品种  抗性鉴定  堆测法
收稿时间:2014/2/16 0:00:00

Evaluation of the resistance of wheat varieties and germplasm resources to BYDV-GAV
Zhang Huawei,Soumou Wansim Nadege,Tao Ye,Song Shuang,Liu Fei and Wu Yunfeng.Evaluation of the resistance of wheat varieties and germplasm resources to BYDV-GAV[J].Acta Phytophylacica Sinica,2014,41(5):584-588.
Authors:Zhang Huawei  Soumou Wansim Nadege  Tao Ye  Song Shuang  Liu Fei and Wu Yunfeng
Institution:State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas; Key Laboratory of Crop Pest Integrated Pest Management on the Loess Plateau of Ministry of Agriculture; Key Laboratory of Plant Protection Resources and Pest Management, Ministry of Education; College of Plant Protection, Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi Province, China;State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas; Key Laboratory of Crop Pest Integrated Pest Management on the Loess Plateau of Ministry of Agriculture; Key Laboratory of Plant Protection Resources and Pest Management, Ministry of Education; College of Plant Protection, Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi Province, China;State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas; Key Laboratory of Crop Pest Integrated Pest Management on the Loess Plateau of Ministry of Agriculture; Key Laboratory of Plant Protection Resources and Pest Management, Ministry of Education; College of Plant Protection, Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi Province, China;State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas; Key Laboratory of Crop Pest Integrated Pest Management on the Loess Plateau of Ministry of Agriculture; Key Laboratory of Plant Protection Resources and Pest Management, Ministry of Education; College of Plant Protection, Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi Province, China;Xianyang Agricultural Research Academy, Xianyang 712000, Shaanxi Province, China;State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas; Key Laboratory of Crop Pest Integrated Pest Management on the Loess Plateau of Ministry of Agriculture; Key Laboratory of Plant Protection Resources and Pest Management, Ministry of Education; College of Plant Protection, Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi Province, China
Abstract:For evaluating the resistance of wheat to GAV of Barley yellow dwarf viruses (BYDVs), 215 wheat varieties and germplasm resources were artificially inoculated with viruliferous aphid Schizaphis graminum by hill plot technique in the field. The results showed that GAV resistance was varied significantly among 215 wheat varieties and germplasm resources. Specifically, 00 zhong 13, Zhong 4, Xinong 979, Linyou 21, 878 and H9020-17-25-6-4, with disease indexes of 18.9, 9.6, 16.3, 21.1, 21.1 and 22.6, respectively, possessed resistance to GAV. In contrast, Ligao 6, Yanzhan 4110, Xinmai 13, Yumai 49, Xumai 856, Jinsui 1, Zhongguochun and 7182 with disease indexes of 68.9, 55.2, 58.5, 54.0, 56.2, 51.5, 55.8 and 53.0, respectively, were considered to be highly susceptible to GAV. The rest with disease indexes ranging from 25.0 to 50 were susceptible to GAV. Furthermore, the symptoms of the four cultivars, Hongxumai, Yumai 34, Xiaobingmai and Jinmai 47, could be alleviated or disappeared at grain-filling stage. Significant difference was observed in the yield losses when wheat varieties with different resistance to GAV were infected with GAV by calculating thousand kernel weight. The yield loss of the resistant varieties, Zhong 4 and Zhong 5, were 5.6% and 7.6%, respectively, followed by the tolerant varieties, Xiaobingmai, Jinmai 47 and Hongxumai, with a 19.9%, 15.2% and 18.3% yield loss, respectively, while the susceptible variety, Ligao 6, had as high as 47.5% yield loss.
Keywords:wheat yellow dwarf disease  variety  resistance identification  hill plot technique
点击此处可从《植物保护学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《植物保护学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号