首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

小麦种子颜色测定的色差计法和目测法及对穗发芽抗性的鉴定效果
引用本文:陈 泠,朱展望,刘易科,佟汉文,何伟杰,邹 娟,张宇庆,高春保. 小麦种子颜色测定的色差计法和目测法及对穗发芽抗性的鉴定效果[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2021, 0(4): 424-429
作者姓名:陈 泠  朱展望  刘易科  佟汉文  何伟杰  邹 娟  张宇庆  高春保
作者单位:(1.湖北省农业科学院粮食作物研究所/粮食作物种质创新与遗传改良湖北省重点实验室/农业部华中地区小麦病害生物学科学观测实验站/湖北省小麦工程技术研究中心,湖北武汉 430064;2.主要粮食作物产业化湖北省协同创新中心,长江大学,湖北荆州 434025)
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFD0100802,2016YFD0101802);国家小麦产业技术体系项目(CARS-03);湖北省技术创新专项重大项目(2018ABA085);粮食作物种质创新与遗传改良湖北省重点实验室开放课题(2017lzjj02)
摘    要:为了解种子颜色目测法和色差计法对小麦穗发芽抗性的鉴定效果,利用这两种方法对1 018份小麦材料种子颜色进行测定,并分析了色差计量指标L~*、a~*、b~*及a~*/b~*、b~*/a~*、a~*/L~*、b~*/L~*值与种子颜色和穗发芽抗性的关系。结果表明:(1)红粒小麦a~*、a~*/b~*和a~*/L~*的均值均显著高于白粒小麦,其他指标均值显著低于白粒小麦;(2)a~*/b~*和b~*/a~*值与种子颜色相关性强,相关系数分别为-0.934和0.941,其线性回归方程可用于判断小麦种子颜色;(3)红粒小麦的穗发芽抗性显著高于白粒小麦,但不同红粒品种之间穗发芽抗性差异很大,变异系数为122.36%;(4)种子颜色及a~*/b~*和b~*/a~*值与穗发芽抗性相关性强,相关系数分别为0.854、-0.831和0.835;其次是a~*/L~*值与穗发芽抗性的相关性,其相关系数为-0.735;(5)目测法获得的种子颜色可解释穗发芽抗性72.9%的变异,色差计参数可解释穗发芽抗性72.5%的变异,但在单独分析时,色差计参数对红粒和白粒小麦穗发芽抗性分别仅能解释11.4%和8.7%的变异。总之,色差计法测量种子颜色,可以作为目测法判别小麦种子颜色的补充方法,用于种子颜色定性和定量比较分析。尽管红粒小麦比白粒小麦抗穗发芽,但鉴于红粒小麦品种(系)间穗发芽抗性差异很大,仍需进行穗发芽抗性鉴定。

关 键 词:小麦;种子颜色;目测法;色差计,穗发芽

Colorimeter Method and Visual Method for Determining the Color of Wheat Grain and Identification Effect of Resistance to Pre-Harvest Sprouting
CHEN Ling,ZHU Zhanwang,LIU Yike,TONG Hanwen,HE Weijie,ZOU Juan,ZHANG Yuqing,GAO Chunbao. Colorimeter Method and Visual Method for Determining the Color of Wheat Grain and Identification Effect of Resistance to Pre-Harvest Sprouting[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2021, 0(4): 424-429
Authors:CHEN Ling  ZHU Zhanwang  LIU Yike  TONG Hanwen  HE Weijie  ZOU Juan  ZHANG Yuqing  GAO Chunbao
Abstract:In order to understand the effect of visual method and colorimeter for identification of resistance to pre-harvest sprouting,the grain colors of 1 018 wheat materials were determined with the two methods,and the relationship between color measurement indexes including LYr69*,a*,b*,a*/b*,b*/a*,a*/LYr69* and b*/LYr69* were analyzed.The results showed that:the mean values of a*,a*/b* and a*/LYr69* of red-grained wheat were significantly higher than those of white-grained wheat,and the average values of other indexes were significantly lower than those of white grained wheat. a*/b* and b*/a* values had strong correlation with grain color,and the correlation coefficients were -0.934 and 0.941,respectively. Grain color,a*/b* and b*/a* had strong correlation with pre-harvest sprouting resistance,and the correlation coefficients were 0.854,-0.831 and 0.835,respectively. The correlation coefficient between a*/LYr69* value and pre harvest sprouting resistance was -0.735. The grain color obtained by visual method can explain 72.9% of the variation of pre harvest sprouting resistance. The colorimeter method can explain 72.5% of the variation of pre-harvest sprouting resistance,but only 11.4% and 8.7% of the variation of red-grained and white-grained wheat can be explained by colorimeter method,respectively. To conclude,the colorimeter method can be used as a supplementary method to visual method to determine the color of wheat grain,which can be used for qualitative and quantitative comparative analysis of grain color. Although red-grained wheat is more resistant to pre-harvest germination than white-grained wheat,it is still necessary to identify the pre-harvest sprouting resistance in view of the great difference in pre-harvest sprouting resistance among red-grained wheat varieties.
Keywords:Wheat   Grain color   Visual method   Colorimeter   Pre-harvest sprouting (PHS)
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《麦类作物学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《麦类作物学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号