首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

湖泊饮用水源地水环境健康风险评价
引用本文:鲁冬梅, 张翠萍, 王玉芬, 等. 玉溪市红塔区飞井海水库饮用水源地水环境健康风险评价[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2020, 35(2): 345-352. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).201905034
作者姓名:鲁冬梅  张翠萍  王玉芬  刘宪斌  李淑英  温继良  朱春蓉  周元清
作者单位:1.云南省玉溪市红塔区环境监测站,云南 玉溪 653100;2.玉溪师范学院,污染控制与生态修复研究中心,云南 玉溪 653100;3.玉溪师范学院 保卫后勤处,云南 玉溪 653100
基金项目:云南省科技厅地方本科高校(部分)基础研究联合专项(2017FH001-125;2017FH001-043);云南省农业环境污染控制与生态修复工程实验室开放基金;云南省农田无公害生产创新团队(2017HC015)
摘    要:目的研究玉溪红塔区饮用水源地水环境特征和人体健康风险,为玉溪地区城市饮用水源地生态环境保护提供参考。方法结合2014—2018年飞井海水库水环境质量检测数据,运用美国国家环保局(US EPA)推荐的水质健康风险评价模型对9项水质指标进行健康风险评估。结果2014—2018年,飞井海水库水质状况良好,除NH3-N外的其余监测指标均符合GB 3838—2002《地表水环境质量标准》I类水标准。水环境总健康风险为4.1×10−5~1.3×10−4 a−1,高于或接近国际辐射防护委员会(ICRP)和US EPA推荐值,但整体呈逐年下降趋势;化学致癌物(Cr6+、As和Cd)的风险值远高于非化学致癌物(F、Cu、NH3-N、NO3、Mn和Fe),主要致癌污染因子为Cr6+;各非致癌物健康危害风险的数量级均为10−9~10−13,其风险值可忽略不计。Pearson相关性分析表明:Cu和F、Mn、Fe、Cd、Cr6+之间、Cr6+和Cu、F、Fe、Mn、Cd之间均呈极显著正相关(P<0.01),其中Cr6+和Cd的相关性极其显著(R2=0.832),说明Cr和Cd含量之间影响较大。结论飞井海水库人体健康危害总风险以化学致癌物风险为主,主要化学致癌物为Cr6+,非化学致癌物中F最高,应予以优先关注和重点管控。

关 键 词:水环境  饮用水源地  污染物  健康风险
收稿时间:2019-05-15
修稿时间:2020-02-16

A new water quality assessment model based on projection pursuit technique
Dongmei LU, Cuiping ZHANG, Yufen WANG, et al. Health Risk Assessment for Drinking Water Source of the Feijinghai Reservoir in Hongta District of Yuxi City[J]. JOURNAL OF YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(Natural Science), 2020, 35(2): 345-352. DOI: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).201905034
Authors:Dongmei LU  Cuiping ZHANG  Yufen WANG  Xianbin LIU  Shuying LI  Jiliang WEN  Chunrong ZHU  Yuanqing ZHOU
Affiliation:1.Environmental Monitoring Station of Hongta District, Yuxi 653100, China;2.Research Center for Pollution Control and Ecological Restoration, Yuxi Normal University, Yuxi 653100, China;3.Security and Logistics Department, Yuxi Normal University, Yuxi 653100, China
Abstract:PurposesThe clarify the water environment characteristics and human health risks of the drinking water sources in Hongta District of Yuxi, and to provided references for ecological environment protection of drinking water sources in Yuxi District.MethodsCombined with the water environment quality test data of Feijinghai Reservoir from 2014 to 2018, the health risk assessments of 9 indicators were evaluated by the US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) recommended health risk assessment model for water quality index.ResultsThe water quality of Feijinghai Reservoir was in good condition from 2014 to 2018. All the monitoring indicators except NH3-N were in conformity with the surface water environment quality standard I (GB 3838—2002). The average annual health risk of individuals caused by drinking route of various pollutants varied between 4.1×10−5 and 1.3×10−4 a−1, both higher than or close to the recommended values of the international commission on radiological protection (ICRP) and US EPA, but the overall trend was decreasing trend year by year. The total chemical carcinogens risk (Cr6+, As, Cd) of drinking water was much higher than that of non-chemical carcinogens (F, Cu, NH3-N, NO3, Mn, Fe), and the main carcinogenic pollutant was Cr6+. The health hazard risk of each non-carcinogen was 10−9-10−13, and the risk value was negligible. Pearson correlation analysis showed that there was a very significant positive correlation between Cu and F, Mn, Fe, Cd, Cr6+ (P<0.01). There was a very significant positive correlation between Cr6+ and Cu, F, Fe, Mn, Cd, and the correlation between Cr6+ and Cd was extremely significant (P<0.01, R2=0.832), indicating that Cr and Cd content had a great influence.ConclusionsThe total risk of human health hazards in Feijinghai Reservoir water was dominated by the risk of chemical carcinogens. The main chemical carcinogens were Cr6+, and the fluoride in non-carcinogens was the highest, which should be given priority attention and key control.
Keywords:water environment  drinking water source  pollutant  health risk
点击此处可从《云南农业大学学报(自然科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《云南农业大学学报(自然科学版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号