首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

优化施氮对设施番茄土壤硝态氮残留及土壤氮平衡的影响
引用本文:寇长林,骆晓声,巨晓棠. 优化施氮对设施番茄土壤硝态氮残留及土壤氮平衡的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(5): 837-848. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.20456
作者姓名:寇长林  骆晓声  巨晓棠
作者单位:1.河南省农业科学院植物营养与资源环境研究所,郑州 450002
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFD0800600,2017YFD0800400)
摘    要:[目的]设施蔬菜生产中普遍存在氮肥施用过量、有机无机肥配合不合理以及灌水频繁等问题,我们通过田间试验研究了优化施氮模式对番茄产量、土壤硝态氮残留和氮平衡的影响,为蔬菜生产优质高效和减量优化施肥提供科学依据.[方法]试验在山东惠民蔬菜大棚内进行,灌水量为农户平均灌水量(482.5 mm)的80%(390 mm),供试蔬菜...

关 键 词:番茄  优化施氮  土壤硝态氮  氮素平衡  土壤无机氮(Nmin)缓冲值
收稿时间:2020-09-09

Effects of optimal nitrogen fertilization on N balance and nitrate-N accumulation in greenhouse tomato fields
KOU Chang-lin,LUO Xiao-sheng,JU Xiao-tang. Effects of optimal nitrogen fertilization on N balance and nitrate-N accumulation in greenhouse tomato fields[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2021, 27(5): 837-848. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.20456
Authors:KOU Chang-lin  LUO Xiao-sheng  JU Xiao-tang
Affiliation:1.Institute of plant Nutrition and Resource Environment, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou 450002, China
Abstract:  【Objectives】  Excessive nitrogen fertilizer application, the unreasonable mixing ratio of organic and inorganic fertilizers, and frequent irrigation are common in facility vegetable production. Here, we proposed three N application modes and studied their effects on tomato yield, soil N residue, and N balance. The results will provide a scientific basis for efficient tomato production and optimized N fertilization.  【Methods】  The experiment was carried out in a vegetable greenhouse in Huimin, Shandong Province. We irrigated the greenhouse at 80% (390 mm) of the average irrigation (482.5 mm) in the study area. Tomato was cultivated with film mulching. Using the basal application of pig manure at N 65 kg/hm2, the conventional nitrogen application rate (N 1000 kg/hm2, TF) and three treatments with 50% nitrogen reduction were set: chicken manure treatment (OF), ordinary urea treatment (CF) and coated urea treatment (CRF). Soil samples were collected at 0–180 cm depth before transplanting and after harvest. Before each fertilization, soil samples were collected to a depth of 0–90 cm (at 30 cm interval) to determine nitrate and ammonium nitrogen contents. After tomato harvest, plant and fruit samples were collected to determine biomass and nutrient content.  【Results】  There were no significant differences in tomato yield and N uptake among the treatments. However, the N rate was one fold higher in TF than in CF treatment. CF, OF and CRF treatments maintain appropriate soil N supply levels during the growing period. Correspondingly, the residual NO3–-N amount in 0–60 cm soil layer of CF, OF, and CRF treatments were 190.1, 227.2 and 310.5 kg/hm2. These values were 56.61%, 43.35%, and 22.59% lower than those recorded in TF treatment. The apparent N loss in CF, OF, and CRF treatment were 416.6, 443.7, and 352.3 kg/hm2, 45.72%, 42.20% and 54.10% lower than those in TF treatment, respectively. Compared with TF, soil N balance surplus in CF, OF, and CRF (P < 0.05) decreased by 34.26%, 33.40%, and 61.78%, respectively. Coated urea maintained more N in the upper soil layer than the other treatments, and its NO3–-N accumulation in 0–30 cm soil layer was 43.0% higher than that in CF treatment. We found two obvious accumulation processes of NO3–-N in the soil surface layer during the growing period of tomato. The first was during the 20–60 days period, and the second occurred during the 110–120 day period after transplanting. Further, there was a depletion process in the 30–60 cm soil layer during the 80–100 day period.  【Conclusions】  Under the experimental conditions, reducing half of the conventional N application rate for tomato can effectively reduce the NO3–-N residue and leaching in the soil of greenhouse tomato, and will not cause a decrease in yield. The application of coated urea is more beneficial to reduce the leaching of N than poultry manure or ordinary urea, and more beneficial to achieve a win-win situation of yield and environmental benefits.
Keywords:
点击此处可从《植物营养与肥料学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《植物营养与肥料学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号