首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Comparison of rapid laboratory tests for failure of passive transfer in the bovine
Authors:Ian Hogan  Michael Doherty  John Fagan  Emer Kennedy  Muireann Conneely  Paula Brady  Clare Ryan  Ingrid Lorenz
Institution:.Department of Agriculture Food and the Marine, Regional Veterinary Laboratory, Knockalisheen, Limerick, Ireland ;.Veterinary Clinical Studies, School of Veterinary Medicine, UCD, Belfield, Dublin 4 Ireland ;.Regional Veterinary Laboratory, Coosan, Athlone, CO. Westmeath Ireland ;.Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co Cork Ireland ;.Herd Health and Animal Husbandry, UCD School of Veterinary Medicine, Belfield, Dublin 4 Ireland
Abstract:

Background

Failure of passive transfer of maternal immunity via colostrum can occur in the bovine, and a number of blood tests have been developed to test calves for this failure. It is not clear which test is most suitable for this purpose. The objective was to examine the most commonly used tests for failure of passive transfer and to decide which is most suitable for routine laboratory use. 126 serum samples were taken from calves of dairy cows after birth but prior to colostrum feeding, and at 48 h of age. Five different tests were compared against radial immunodiffusion which is considered the appropriate reference method. These tests were serum gamma-glutamyltransferase levels, serum protein levels, serum globulin levels, an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay and the zinc sulphate turbidity test.

Results

The tests examined displayed high sensitivity but widely varying specificity. Examination of the use of different cut-off points allowed some improvement in specificity at the expense of sensitivity, but the tests which had performed best at the original cut-off points still displayed the best performance. Gamma-glutamyltransferase levels as a measure of colostrum absorption returned, in this study, the best balance between sensitivity and specificity. The ELISA used in this study and serum globulin levels displayed performance similar to the gamma-glutamyltransferase levels. Serum total protein was less successful than others examined at providing both sensitivity and specificity but may, when performed via refractometer, be useful for on-farm testing. As currently performed the poor sensitivity for which the zinc sulphate turbidity test is most often criticized is evident. Modification of the cut-off point to increase specificity is less successful at balancing these parameters than the ELISA, gamma-glutamyltransferase levels, and globulin levels.

Conclusions

Gamma-glutamyltransferase levels, ELISA testing and circulating globulin levels performed best in detecting failure of passive transfer in serum samples, although all three had some practical considerations.
Keywords:Failure of passive transfer  Calves  Laboratory tests  Disadvantages in practicality
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号