Susceptibility of N'Dama cattle to experimental challenge and cross-species superchallenges with bloodstream forms of Trypanosoma congolense and T. vivax.

Susceptibility to Trypanosoma congolense, T. vivax challenge and cross species-superchallenges, and related effects on health and productivity were assessed in N'Dama cattle. Twenty-five N'Dama bulls aged 3-4 years and previously primed with trypanosome infections through natural tsetse exposure over more than one year were used. The experimental herd was divided in five groups each composed of five randomly selected animals. Group 1 was challenged with T. congolense, Group 2 with T. vivax, Group 3 was inoculated with T. congolense followed by a cross-superchallenge with T. vivax, Group 4 was inoculated with T. vivax followed by T. congolense cross-superchallenge. Animals in Group 5 were used as controls. Both T. vivax and T. congolense cross-superchallenges were carried out on Day 14 subsequent to respective initial T. congolense and T. vivax inoculations. All challenges were performed by intradermal needle inoculation of stocks of trypanosome bloodstream forms. In challenged animals (Group 1 to 4), parasitaemia profiles and packed red cell volumes (PCV) were measured for four months. Weight changes were recorded monthly and daily weight gain (DWG) computed. All cattle challenged with T. congolense became parasitaemic. Conversely, one animal in Group 2 and two in Group 3 never displayed patent T. vivax parasitaemia. Both in single (Group 1), initial (Group 3) and cross-superchallenged (Group 4) cattle higher percentage of positive blood samples and higher parasitaemia level were obtained following T. congolense than T. vivax inocula (Group 2, 3 and 4) (P<0.04 or greater). Overall the pre-challenge period, PCV values and DWGs were nearly identical in the five groups. Conversely, over the post-challenge period, cattle singly, initially and cross-superinoculated with T. congolense (Group 1, 3 and 4) displayed lower PCV values and DWGs in comparison with both control animals (Group 5) and with singly T. vivax challenged cattle (Group 2) (P<0.05 or greater). No difference in mean PCV levels and DWGs was found between animals in Group 2 and cattle in Group 5. It was concluded that trypanotolerant N'Dama cattle suffered more from T. congolense and mixed T. congolensel T. vivax infections, while pure T. vivax infection did not produce appreciable negative effects on their health and productivity. Therefore, considering that tsetse and trypanosomosis control campaigns are costly and are justified only when derived economic benefits exceed those of control, and also that an ample mosaic of farming systems exists in West Africa, species-specific trypanosome prevalence and relative impact should be assessed in various cattle populations and breeds differing in trypanosome susceptibility before advising any intervention. Moreover, virulence and related effects of T. congolense and T. vivax endemic stocks on health and productivity in local cattle populations should also be estimated in order to counsel appropriate economic protection measures against trypanosmosis, i.e. vector control and/or strategic use of trypanocidal drugs.