Identification and description of forested vegetation communities available to woodland caribou: relating wildlife habitat to forest cover data |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. General Ecology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Process Engineering, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Platz der Deutschen Einheit 1, 03046 Cottbus, Germany;2. Department of Ecology and Environmental Protection, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznan, Poland;3. lanaplan GbR, Lobbericher Straße 5, 41334 Nettetal, Germany;4. Faculty of Biology, Department of Aquatic Ecology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstraße 5, 45141 Essen, Germany;2. Department of Geography and Land Management, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Vilnius University, Lithuania;3. Nature Research Centre, Akademijos str. 2, LT–08412 Vilnius, Lithuania;4. Climatic Change and Climate Impacts, Institute for Environmental Sciences, route de Drize 7, CH-1227 Carouge-Geneva, Switzerland;1. Oregon State University, Applied Economics, 213 Ballard Extension Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331, United States;2. Oregon State University, Forest Engineering, Resources & Management, 218 Snell Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331, United States;3. Oregon State University, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2067 Kelly Engineering Center, Corvallis, OR 97331, United States |
| |
Abstract: | Multivariate analyses were applied to forest canopy and understory data collected in 70 forest stands in the Mid-Boreal Upland Ecoregion in Saskatchewan. Random sampling of various types of forest focused on vegetation strata shown elsewhere to be of importance to woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou Gmelin). Cluster analyses revealed seven community types based on summer vegetation, and six community types when considering vegetation present during winter. Ordination by nonmetric multidimensional scaling suggested that two of the seven summer communities be combined, and that six community types be recognized in each season. Stands dominated by Populus tremuloides Michx. were all placed in one community type as were those dominated by Picea glauca (Moench) Voss. Young stands of Pinus banksiana Lamb. were placed in one community type, while the division of older stands was related to degree of canopy closure. The primary division among Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P. dominated stands was also based on the degree of canopy closure. Canonical correspondence analysis revealed strong relationships between the vegetation communities and data on canopy characteristics contained in the provincial forest inventory. In general, the techniques we employ provide a framework for objectively deriving vegetation communities relevant to wildlife species, and measuring their correspondence with readily available forest cover data. Specifically, we describe community types available to woodland caribou in our study area and their relationship to the provincial forest inventory. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|