首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

液态肥料中氨基酸态氮两种测定方法比较
引用本文:陶海霞,史久英,水蓉,王荣德.液态肥料中氨基酸态氮两种测定方法比较[J].甘肃农业科技,2010(5):19-21.
作者姓名:陶海霞  史久英  水蓉  王荣德
作者单位:甘肃省农业科学院畜草与绿色农业研究所,甘肃,兰州,730070
摘    要:采用甲醛-指示剂滴定法、甲醛-电极法测定液态肥料中的氨基酸态氮。结果表明,两种方法均适合于液态肥料中氨基酸态氮的测定,其中甲醛-电极法重复性试验标准偏差为0.013 0,变异系数为1.320%,平均回收率为99.25%,回收率标准偏差为0.978 0,变异系数为0.985%,均小于甲醛-指示剂法的相应参数,表明甲醛-电极法检测精度高于甲醛-指示剂法。甲醛用量以10.0 mL为宜。

关 键 词:液态肥料  氨基酸态氮  测定方法  比较

The Comparison of Two Determination Methods for Amino Acid Nitrogen in Liquid Fertilizer
TAO Hai-xia,SHI Jiu-ying,SHUI Rong,WANG Rong-de.The Comparison of Two Determination Methods for Amino Acid Nitrogen in Liquid Fertilizer[J].Gansu Agricultural Science and Technology,2010(5):19-21.
Authors:TAO Hai-xia  SHI Jiu-ying  SHUI Rong  WANG Rong-de
Institution:(Institute of Livestock Grass and Green Agriculture,Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Lanzhou Gansu 730070,China)
Abstract:Using formaldehyde Indicator method and formaldehyde electrode method determine Amino acid nitrogen in liquid fertilizer.The results show that both methods were suitable for liquid fertilizer in the determination of amino acid nitrogen,meanwhile,using formaldehyde electrode method,repeatability standard deviation was 0.013 0,coefficient of variation was 1.320%,the average recovery was 99.25%,standard deviation of recovery was 0.978 0,recovery coefficient of variation was 0.985%,these data were less than the corresponding parameters of using formaldehyde Indicator method,indicating,the detection accuracy of formaldehyde electrode method was higher than of formaldehyde Indicator method.Suitable amount of formaldehyde was 10.0 mL.
Keywords:Liquid fertilizer  Amino acid nitrogen  Determination method  Comparison
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号