首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

耕作方式对长期免耕农田土壤微生物生物量碳的影响
引用本文:孔凡磊,张明园,范士超,张海林,陈阜.耕作方式对长期免耕农田土壤微生物生物量碳的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2011,19(2):240-245.
作者姓名:孔凡磊  张明园  范士超  张海林  陈阜
作者单位:中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院,北京,100193
基金项目:国家科技支撑计划项目(2006BAD15B01, 2007BAD89B08)和农业部公益性行业(农业)科研专项(200803028)资助
摘    要:以华北冬小麦-夏玉米两熟区长期免耕土壤为研究对象, 研究不同耕作方式(免耕、翻耕和旋耕)对长期免耕土壤微生物生物量碳(SMBC)的影响, 为制定合理的轮耕制度提供依据。试验结果表明: 长期免耕土壤进行耕作处理后SMBC 的时空分布和稳定性产生显著变化。不同耕作处理SMBC 含量在0~5 cm 和5~10 cm 土层变化明显, 小麦起身期含量最低, 收获期最高; 深层SMBC变化不明显。免耕处理SMBC 随土壤层次明显降低, 且各土壤层次SMBC 差异达显著(P<0.05)水平; 翻耕、旋耕处理0~5 cm 和5~10 cm 土层间SMBC 无明显差异, 其他层次间差异显著(P<0.05)。从生育期平均值看, 0~5 cm 土层免耕处理SMBC 含量较高, 翻耕和旋耕处理则分别比免耕降低6.7%、6.1%; 与免耕相比, 5~10 cm 土层SMBC 翻耕、旋耕处理分别增加30.2%和20.7%(P<0.01),10~20 cm 土层SMBC 翻耕、旋耕处理比免耕增加48.1%(P<0.01)和10.5%(P<0.05)。在冬小麦生育期内, 0~20 cm土层SMBC 稳定性表现为翻耕>旋耕>免耕, 20~30 cm 土层SMBC 稳定性表现为免耕>翻耕>旋耕。

关 键 词:轮耕制度  免耕土壤  免耕  翻耕  旋耕  土壤微生物生物量碳(SMBC)
收稿时间:2010/6/29 0:00:00
修稿时间:2010/11/11 0:00:00

Effect of tillage practices on soil microbial biomass carbon in the field with long-term non-tillage
KONG Fan-Lei,ZHANG Ming-Yuan,FAN Shi-Chao,ZHANG Hai-Lin and CHEN Fu.Effect of tillage practices on soil microbial biomass carbon in the field with long-term non-tillage[J].Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture,2011,19(2):240-245.
Authors:KONG Fan-Lei  ZHANG Ming-Yuan  FAN Shi-Chao  ZHANG Hai-Lin and CHEN Fu
Institution:College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
Abstract:In order to provide a reasonable basis for the rotational tillage system, the effects of different tillage practices on soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) were determined in double maturation of wheat-corn cropping fields with long-term non-tillage in North China Plain. The results showed that tillage managements significantly influenced spatio-temporal variations and stability of SMBC in long-term non-tillage soil. SMBC in the 0~5 cm and 5~10 cm soil layers exhibited obvious seasonal variations in different treatments. While the lowest value was at double ridge stage, the maximum was at harvest stage of wheat. In deep soil layers, there were insignificant seasonal variations in SMBC. SMBC significantly decreased (P<0.05) with soil depth under non-tillage and straw mulch (NT) treatment. In the 0~5 cm and 5~10 cm soil layers, SMBC was insignificantly different under conventional tillage (CT) and rotary tillage (RT). Among all other soil layers, however, SMBC was significantly different (P<0.05). Compared with NT treatment, CT and RT dropped average SMBC by 6.7% and 6.1% in the 0~5 cm layer. However, CT and RT significantly increased SMBC by 30.2% and 20.7% (P<0.01) in the 5~10 cm layer. Also average SMBC under RT and CT increased significantly by 10.5% (P<0.05) and 48.1% (P<0.01) in the 10~20 cm layer. The trend of the effects of different treatments on SMBC stability in the 0~20 cm soil layer was as follows: CT > RT > NT. That in the 20~30 cm soil layer was NT > CT > RT.
Keywords:Rotational tillage system  Long-term non-tillage soil  Non-tillage (NT)  Conventional tillage (CT)  Rotary tillage (RT)  Soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC)
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国生态农业学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国生态农业学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号