森林可持续经营综合评价方法比较研究

通过实例比较分析了AHP法、熵权法、熵AHP法3种森林可持续经营指标权重计算方法,及线性加权和法、指数加权法2种森林可持续经营综合评价模型。研究表明:在评价指标的权重计算方面,熵AHP方法集专家决策与数据信息决策于一体,客观科学;在森林可持续经营综合评价方面,指数加权法模型考虑了森林经营的多目标和协调发展要求,较接近森林经营现实。因此,基于熵AHP方法的指数加权法模型是一种可行的森林可持续经营综合评价方法。

Comparative Study on the Comprehensive Evaluation Methods for the Sustainable Forest Management

Through the case study,three calculation methods of the index weight including AHP method,entropy weight method,entropy-AHP method,and two comprehensive evaluation models of the sustainable forest management including the linear weighted sum model,the weighted index model were compared and analyzed.The results prove that the entropy AHP method is an objective and scientific method which integrates the expert decision and the data information decision into one to evaluate the index weight,and the weighted index model is a reasonable comprehensive evaluation model which takes into account the multi-target operation and the coordinated development requirements of the forests and the results are close to the reality of the forest management.So,the weighted index model based on entropy-AHP is a feasible,comprehensive evaluation method of the sustainable forest management.