首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

春麦田禾本科杂草化学防除药效评价
引用本文:王燕,沈煜洋,陈利,马晓燕,陈瑞刚,皇甫蓓炯,高海峰,李广阔.春麦田禾本科杂草化学防除药效评价[J].新疆农业科学,2021,58(1):92-98.
作者姓名:王燕  沈煜洋  陈利  马晓燕  陈瑞刚  皇甫蓓炯  高海峰  李广阔
作者单位:1.奇台县农业技术推广中心, 新疆奇台 831800; 2.新疆农业科学院植物保护研究所/农业部西北荒漠绿洲作物有害生物综合治理重点实验室, 乌鲁木齐 830091
基金项目:国家重点研发计划(2018YFD0200406);新疆农业科学院科技创新重点培育专项(xjkcpy-003);国家小麦产业技术体系乌鲁木齐综合试验站(CARS-3-49)
摘    要:目的]筛选对春小麦田野燕麦、狗尾草等禾本科杂草具有较好防效的除草剂,为安全高效应用除草剂提供依据.方法]通过田间药效试验,采用随机区组的方法,定点取样调查各处理小区的杂草株数、鲜质量,评价供试药剂对春麦田杂草的防除效果及对春小麦的安全性.结果]药后30 d,7.5%啶磺草胺WG 8.44、11.25和14.06 ...

关 键 词:春麦田  除草剂  禾本科杂草  药效评价
收稿时间:2020-04-14

Evaluation of Chemical Control Efficacy of Grass Weeds in Spring Wheat Field
WANG Yan,SHEN Yuyang,CHEN Li,MA Xiaoyan,CHEN Ruigang,HUANGFU Beijiong,GAO Haifeng,LI Guangkuo.Evaluation of Chemical Control Efficacy of Grass Weeds in Spring Wheat Field[J].Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences,2021,58(1):92-98.
Authors:WANG Yan  SHEN Yuyang  CHEN Li  MA Xiaoyan  CHEN Ruigang  HUANGFU Beijiong  GAO Haifeng  LI Guangkuo
Institution:1. Qitai Agricultural Technology Extension Center, Qitai Xinjiang 831800,China; 2. Key Laboratory of Integrated Crop Pest Management in Northwestern Oasis of China,MOARA, Institute of Plant Protection,Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Urumqi 830091,China
Abstract:【Objective】 The aim of present study is to screen out herbicide which might have better control effect on grass weeds such as avena fatua and setaria viridis of spring wheat field in order to provide guidance for scientific, safe and efficient use of the herbicides.【Method】 Randomized block design was used to research the number and the fresh weight of weeds at fixed spots, and the effect of herbicides on weeds and safety to spring wheat was evaluated.【Result】 After thirty days, the plant control effect and fresh weight control effect of 7.5% pyroxsulam WG 8.44, 11.25, 14.06 g/hm2, 30% mesosulfuron - methyl OD 45.00, 67.50, 90.00 g/hm2 and 70% flucarbazone WG 18.90, 25.20, 31.50 g/hm2 was 93.65%-100.00% and 97.55%-100.00% on grass weeds in spring wheat field, respectively. The plant control effect and fresh weight control effect of 69 g/L fenoxaprop-p-ethyl EW 82.80 g/hm2, 15% clodinafop - propargyl WP 67.50 g/hm2, 5% traxos EC 60.00 g/hm2and 3.6% mesosulfuron - methyl·iodosulfuron - methyl - sodium WG 10.80 g/hm2was 92.62%-97.88% and 95.66%-98.41% on grass weeds in spring wheat field, respectively. There was no significant difference between plant control effect and fresh weight e control effect of each treatment. All the treatments did not negatively influence the growth and development of the spring wheat.【Conclusion】 7.5% pyroxsulam WG 8.44, 11.25 g/hm2, 30% mesosulfuron - methyl OD 45.00, 67.50 g/hm2, 70% flucarbazone WG, 25.20 g/hm2, 69 g/L fenoxaprop-p-ethyl EW 82.80 g/hm2, 15% clodinafop - propargyl WP 67.50 g/hm2, 5% traxos EC 60.00 g/hm2and 3.6% mesosulfuron - methyl·iodosulfuron - methyl - sodium WG 10.80 g/hm2can effectively control grass weeds such as avena fatua and setaria viridis of spring wheat field. They are safe for the growth of spring wheat and can be used in field alternation reasonably.
Keywords:spring wheat field  herbicide  grass weed  efficacy evaluation  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《新疆农业科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《新疆农业科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号