Influence of elevated ecosystems levels on litter decomposition and mineralization

Litter decomposition was studied at two forested watersheds in east Tennessee which differed primarily in their past history of atmospheric S input. Cross Creek Watershed, located near a large coal-fired power plant, has received greater S inputs than the more remote Camp Branch Watershed. Decomposition was estimated through the measurement of forest floor respiration, litter microflora populations, litter and soil microarthropod populations, and litter nutrient status. Average forest floor respiration rates were very similar, 6.78 g CO₂ m^?2 day^?1 or 2472 g m^?2 yr^?1 at Camp Branch and 6.86 g CO₂ m^?2 day^?1 or 2505 g M^?2 yr^?1 at Cross Creek. Fractional loss rates provided estimates of annual decay rates (k) of 0.35 and 0.39 for Camp Branch and Cross Creek, respectively. Litter decomposition was estimated to contribute 23% of the total CO₂ output at Camp Branch and 26% at Cross Creek, while root respiration accounts for about 43 to 46%. Bacterial and fungal populations were about equal in size at both watersheds, with bacteria averaging 100 × 106 g^?1 of litter and fungi 23 × 106 g^?1 of litter. Total numbers of arthropods averaged 34% greater at Camp Branch. Acarina populations averaged 59% higher at Camp Branch, while Collembola numbers were about equal at the two watersheds. Nutrient mobility in the litter and soil was similar at both watersheds. The order of decreasing mobility was K, Mg, Ca, S, N, and P. Litterfall nutrient concentrations were slightly higher for all elements at Cross Creek, resulting in greater litter concentrations of Ca and Mg. Litter concentrations of S and N, however, were significantly greater at Camp Branch, indicating watershed differences in the loss rates and cycling processes of these elements. There were no differences between the loss rates or litter concentrations of P, K, and Na at either site. Overall, decomposition was similar at the two watersheds. Historic S inputs do not appear to have had a major effect on decomposition rate or decomposer organisms with the possible exception of lowered arthropod populations at Cross Creek.