首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Brazilian biosafety law and the new breeding technologies
Authors:Alexandre Lima NEPOMUCENO  Renata FUGANTI-PAGLIARINI  Maria Sueli Soares FELIPE  Hugo Bruno Correa MOLINARI  Edivaldo Domingues VELINI  Eduardo Romano de Campos PINTO  Maria Lucia Zaidan DAGLI  Galdino ANDRADE FILHO  Patr&#  cia Machado Bueno FERNANDES
Institution:Embrapa Soybean, Londrina 86001970, Brazil;CTNBio (National Biosafety Technical Commission), Brasília 70610200, Brazil;Embrapa Soybean, Londrina 86001970, Brazil;Catholic University of Brasilia, Brasília 70790160, Brazil;CTNBio (National Biosafety Technical Commission), Brasília 70610200, Brazil;Embrapa Agroenergy, Biological Station Park, Brasilia 70770901, Brazil;CTNBio (National Biosafety Technical Commission), Brasília 70610200, Brazil;Paulista State University Julio de Mesquita Filho, Botucatu Faculty of Agronomic Sciences, Botucatu 18610307, Brazil;CTNBio (National Biosafety Technical Commission), Brasília 70610200, Brazil;Embrapa Biotechnology and Genetic Resources—Biological Station Park, Brasília 70770900, Brazil;CTNBio (National Biosafety Technical Commission), Brasília 70610200, Brazil;S(a)o Paulo University, Veterinary Faculty, S(a)o Paulo 05508900, Brazil;CTNBio (National Biosafety Technical Commission), Brasília 70610200, Brazil;Londrina State University, Microbiology Department, University Campus, Londrina 86051990, Brazil;CTNBio (National Biosafety Technical Commission), Brasília 70610200, Brazil;Espírito Santo Federal University, Biotechnology Post Graduation, Vitória 29040090, Brazil;CTNBio (National Biosafety Technical Commission), Brasília 70610200, Brazil
Abstract:Globally, the area of land cultivated with genetically modified (GM) crops has increased a thousand-fold over the last two decades. Although this technology has become important for food production, the regulatory frameworks that underpin these outcomes are based on a list of requirements for a risk assessment that differ from country to country. In recent years, policymakers have had the opportunity to learn from the controversies over transgenics to create effective regulatory milestones for emerging technologies, allowing them to reach their potential for a more sustainable agriculture, ensuring food security. In Brazil, Law No. 11.105 of 24 March 2005 established a framework with four main organizations responsible for risk assessment and management. However, most of new breeding technologies did not exist at that time and were not considered in this law. In 2016, Normative Resolution No. 16 of the National Biosafety Technical Commission (CTNBio) was established to address this gap based on the evaluation of the products obtained through these techniques (termed Innovative Precision Improvement Techniques in the resolution), in a case-by-case consultation system. Briefly, if the product is designated to be a GM, the developer will have to go through the biosafety requirements and will be approved only after CTNBio risk assessment. If the product is designated not to be GM (for the purposes of the legislation), then it can be registered using the existing procedures. Currently, 152 GM products are commercially approved in Brazil. In 2018, CTNBio assessed the first consultation on commercial release of plants generated using the new breeding technologies and has subsequently approved six products. It is expected that many institutions would be able to participate in Brazilian and world markets, developing and introducing new biotechnological solutions and products through a more sustainable approach and without facing public disapproval, a common issue for GM crops.
Keywords:Brazilian legislation  CTNBio  genetically modified crops  
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号