首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


From measuring impact to learning institutional lessons: an innovation systems perspective on improving the management of international agricultural research
Institution:1. Sustainability Research Institute, University of Leeds, UK;2. Indaba Agricultural Policy Research Institute, Lusaka, Zambia;3. School of Economics and Business, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway;1. Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Institute of Socio-Economics, Eberswalder Str. 84, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany;2. AURELIUS Research & Consulting, Hauptstr. 93, 12159 Berlin, Germany;3. Humboldt-University of Berlin: Division of Horticultural Economics, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany;1. DINÂMIA''CET-IUL, ISCTE, Av. das Forças Armadas, Edifício ISCTE, Sala 2 N19, 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal;2. LNEG — Laboratório Nacional de Energia e Geologia, Estrada do Paço do Lumiar, 22, 1649-038 Lisboa, Portugal
Abstract:This paper argues that impact assessment research has not made more of a difference because the measurement of the economic impact has poor diagnostic power. In particular it fails to provide research managers with critical institutional lessons concerning ways of improving research and innovation as a process. Our contention is that the linear input–output assumptions of economic assessment need to be complemented by an analytical framework that recognises systems of reflexive, learning interactions and their location in, and relationship with, their institutional context. The innovation systems framework is proposed as an approach where institutional learning is explicit. Three case studies of recent developments in international agricultural research are presented to illustrate these points. We conclude by suggesting that the innovation systems framework has much to offer research managers wishing to monitor and learn new ways of addressing goals such as poverty alleviation. The greatest challenge however, is that such holistic learning frameworks must contend for legitimacy if they are to complement the dominant paradigm of economic assessment.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号