| Abstract: | The deep and wide continental range and climate occupied bythe European species Picea abies is contrasted with the long,narrow, and humid coastal strip which the American species Piceasitchensis inhabits. Norway is the more plastic spruce and cansuffer thinner soils and much more drought, but neither spruceis a shallow rooter where soils are good and deep. Of the two,the litter of Sitka is less harmful to the soil. To date thereis no evidence that height for height Norway is more stableunder high wind pressures, but the belief that it is less sensitiveto frost than Sitka is well established. Sitka is far superiorto Norway for planting at high altitudes and in exposed placesand on Molinia peatlands in Britain, which accounts for thevast preponderance of the American species used in the westand north of the British Isles. The present popularity of Norwayspruce with foresters and timber merchants is admitted, butthe point is made that in planting it where Sitka could growwell, only some 75 per cent, of the volume will be secured.Finally, the types of site which each spruce requires and alsowhich each cannot take are considered in detail. A plea is madefor mixtures in certain circumstances, and the belief expoundedthat only deeper and better cultivation of the hardpacked materialunder-lying thin soils will make it possible to extend considerablyour acreage of really stable crops of these high-volume producers. |
